Search for: "German v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 1,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The ECJ’s ruling stated: “The German and United Kingdom Governments further observe that ‘investment advice’, defined in Article 4(1)(4) of Directive 2004/39 and listed in point 5 of Section A of Annex I thereto, consists, according to the wording of Article 52 of Directive 2006/73, in recommending the completion of a transaction in relation to a particular financial instrument. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 2:17 pm by Kirk Jenkins
” Yesterday, the Illinois Supreme Court agreed to review the decision, granting leave to appeal in Spanish Court Two Condominium Association v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:02 am by rhapsodyinbooks
United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 10:30 am by Magdaleen Jooste
The CHIPS Act pushes chip manufacturing back to the United States due of national security concerns. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:04 am by Mark Radcliffe
On June 28, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Bilski v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:15 am by Jen Kreder
My first post focused on the most recent Nazi-looted art appeal in the United States, which was filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:44 am by Florian Mueller
While German law is somewhat complicated in this context, Japanese law apparently provides the courts with a straightforward and powerful tool, in the form of Article 1, to declare patents unenforceable or, at least, to deny certain remedies.In the United States, the denial of injunctive relief is a question of equity. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 10:23 am by Florian Mueller
The anti-suit injunction and the summary judgment ruling focused on injunctive relief, but arguably it's also inconsistent with their spirit to press on with foreign litigation over monetary relief instead of having the dispute resolved in the United States. [read post]
6 May 2009, 8:20 am by Terese Arenth
Respondent also sells flowers, as a wholesaler of fresh cut flowers for the United States market. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:37 am by Eric Goldman
The court concludes: Whether it is wise for members of the United States Congress to block critical constituents from their social-media accounts is not for a court to say. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 12:26 am
€$€The Authors' Take:-- Disparaging or offensive trademark registrations in the United States Are there any limits after the US Supreme Court's decision in Matal v Tam? [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Germany of 6 September 1978,  Malone v. the United Kingdom  from August 2, 1984, etc.).58. interpretative value of the preamble is deeply rooted in countries with common law system ( common law ), Preamble to the Constitution embodying a guiding framework for constitutional interpretation.59. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:51 pm
., the Court states that “[t]here is neither a bar nor a presumption against appointing foreign entities to serve as lead plaintiff, particularly where, as here, the defendant is a U.S. company and the foreign entities bought their shares in the United States”, in effect dismissing the res judicata concerns raised by other movants in relation to the appointment of a foreign entity as lead plaintiff. [read post]