Search for: "Good v. Commissioner of Correction" Results 421 - 440 of 523
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Nov 2010, 4:45 am by Rosalind English
All this casts a great deal more mud than light on what the Supreme Court itself acknowledges to be the “both difficult and important” issue of the correct evidential threshold. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 12:02 am by INFORRM
The Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human rights yesterday heard the conjoined applications in Von Hannover v Germany and Springer v Germany. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 12:15 pm by THE KONG FIRM PLLC
 From one perspective, it is ultimately a good thing for employers, because it may actually prevent potential liability. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 9:17 pm by Josh Wright
But in reading Commissioner Rosch’s separate statement on the new HMGs, I was intrigued by what seems to be a mistake the Commissioner has made repeatedly. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Additionally, McWane has already undertaken corrective measures to resolve the violations, at a cost of more than $7.6 million. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 12:25 am by Marie Louise
(China Law Blog)   Europe ACTA in secret reading room for EU Parliament (IP Watch)  Battle lines drawn on ACTA: EU Commissioner says scope is ‘Red Line’ for treaty (Michael Geist) ACTA briefing by De Gucht in the European Parliament (Knowledge Ecology International) EU expresses anger over US ‘Hypocrisy’ on ACTA (Michael Geist) EU Commission unveils latest Patent Reform proposal (Patent Docs)  The aura of luxury and the Court of Justice ruling in Copad… [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:01 am by Anthony J. Vecchio
The commission may, at its discretion and for good cause shown, issue licenses which shall expire on a date fixed by it. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:34 am
Put simply, this refers to the situation where A causes harm to B (or to everyone) but does not suffer the costs of those harms themselves and so has no or few incentives to correct/avoid them. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:50 pm
Stryker Corp (271 Patent Blog) CAFC: Court will not correct claim drafting error to avoid ‘absurdity’: Haemonetics, Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 10:32 am by Jeff Gamso
  He was due to be murdered by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction on June 10. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
  Thus, this bill would overrule the California Supreme Court in Chavez v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:35 am
Any information produced by the person, or produced on his behalf, in regard to his rehabilitation and good conduct; and8. [read post]