Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 421 - 440
of 8,129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2019, 1:11 pm
Under United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 11:47 am
That made them, according to the United States, California residents. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 9:52 pm
A supplement purchaser stated California consumer protection law claims against a supplement manufacturer for allegedly making false and misleading advertising statements, the federal district court in Oakland, California, has held.The majority of the purchaser’s first amended complaint that the manufacturer falsely advertised its Muscle Milk Ready–To-Drink and Muscle Milk Bars was dismissed (CCH State Unfair Trade Practices Law ¶32,442).The court… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:46 am
In 2009, the California Court of Appeal in Bosetti v. [read post]
11 May 2013, 10:41 am
Hom and Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 5:44 am
In Nickel v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 8:12 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 12:45 pm
Superior Court (42 Cal. 4th 443 (2007)) remains good law until a higher court rules otherwise. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 12:18 pm
State of California, in which the state appeals the summary judgment by the U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 3:16 pm
(Here, after some wiretaps, the police stopped a drug-laden vehicle, but told the driver that he was being stopped for an illegal lane change -- a lie -- because the police did not want to reveal the nature of the ongoing investigation.)Judge Berzon argues that several states, including California, have adopted precisely such a rule as a matter of good practice. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 7:45 am
Jonathan Cervas (Carnegie Mellon University), Bernard Grofman (University of California, Irvine), & Scott Matsuda (New York Law School) have posted The Role Of State Courts In Constraining Partisan Gerrymandering In Congressional Elections on SSRN. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 2:22 am
Her order requires the State of California to either retry Mr. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:48 am
State v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
In this regard, the Court reasoned as follows:First, jurisprudence suggesting that the mental state of an alleged infringer was irrelevant usually concerned – people who did not know that the goods (containing the infringing sign) that they were selling or otherwise handling were not genuine from the trade mark proprietor rather than those who did not even know that a sign identical or similar to the trade mark existed on the goods at all. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:26 am
One of the bills is referred to as "Elkins legislation" because it addresses issues arising from a 2007 California Supreme Court ruling, Elkins v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Some say it could be the biggest ruling since Roe v. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 8:47 am
Since 2013, California has outlawed new semiautomatic handgunsCan a state ban all new handguns? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:15 pm
The first, Golden State Water Company v. [read post]
