Search for: "Grant v. Walls" Results 421 - 440 of 2,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2007, 4:25 pm
But I'm persuaded that that's not currently the law (statutory or common), and hence that summary judgment was properly granted to the defendant. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 11:42 pm by Mark Summerfield
Back in November 2015, the Australian Patent Office issued the first published decision to consider enhanced requirements for patent specifications that were introduced by the Intellectual Property Laws Amendment (Raising the Bar) Act 2012: CSR Building Products Limited v United States Gypsum Company [2015] APO 72.The decision arises from an opposition by CSR Building Products Limited to the grant of a patent on an application by United States Gypsum Company. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 7:00 am by Amy Howe
  Nina Totenberg previewed the case for NPR; coverage of the oral arguments comes from Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal and Jaclyn Belczyk of JURIST (who also covers the second case yesterday, Lexmark International v. [read post]
9 Apr 2008, 7:43 am
Their petition asserts that the broad grant of power to waive all existing federal statutes violates the non-delegation doctrine and also constitutes an unconstitutional delegation of the power to repeal existing legislation in violation of Clinton v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm by Santiago A. Cueto
In making the ruling, Judge Atlas relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 4:23 pm by Santiago A. Cueto
In making the ruling, Judge Atlas relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 6:12 pm by Lee Thomason
So, to speed the plow, the Judge granted thirty days for new counsel to enter its appearance. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 6:58 am by Anna Christensen
On Monday Lyle covered those cases, as well as the cert. grants in Robertson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 5:56 am by David Lat
[How Appealing] * And SCOTUS also grants cert to a case raising the scope of what prosecutors must disclose to the defense under Brady v. [read post]