Search for: "HAIR v. STATE" Results 421 - 440 of 1,759
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2018, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This is what the City Council wanted in enacting the law, and this is how the state courts are now interpreting it.The case is Suri v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
” Somehow this morphs as the interrogation proceeds into Dassey saying that Avery cut off her hair, punched her, cut her, and shot her. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:00 am by Brian Gallini
” Somehow this morphs as the interrogation proceeds into Dassey saying that Avery cut off her hair, punched her, cut her, and shot her. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:19 am by SHG
After all, if Trump nominates him, he must be the anti-Christ who will reverse Roe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 10:25 am by Eric Goldman
By tomorrow, the California legislature likely will pass a sweeping, lengthy, overly-complicated, and poorly-constructed privacy law that will have ripple effects throughout the world. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 3:03 am by Walter Olson
Marco Rubio, Elizabeth Warren team up on federal bill to curb practice of yanking occupational licenses over unpaid student debt [Eric Boehm] “Pennsylvania’s Governor Calls for Abolishing 13 Occupational Licenses” [same] Licensing reform generally hasn’t been a partisan battle, but party-line vote in California legislative committee has derailed one promising bill [same] Nebraska gets out in front on the issue with a bill sponsored by libertarian state senator Laura… [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
When I was a freshly minted housing adviser (with hair) in about 1989, Nic ran the first legal training course I ever attended, back in the days of SHAC. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 10:17 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
When I was a freshly minted housing adviser (with hair) in about 1989, Nic ran the first legal training course I ever attended, back in the days of SHAC. [read post]
23 May 2018, 3:02 pm by Peter Reap
Patent Application No. 13/789,575 for methods of removing hair by using nanoparticles to damage hair follicles lacked sufficient written description under § 112 of the Patent Act, the U.S. [read post]
The Member States could proactively ask an organization to show how it complies with GDPR under Art. 24, but more likely than not the first test for many organizations will be how they respond to data subject access requests (DSARs) or when they experience a personal data breach which they will likely need to report to their Supervisory Authority due to the relatively hair trigger reporting thresholds. [read post]