Search for: "HALE v. HALE"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,471
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2017, 6:17 pm
Al Kassar, 660 F.3d 108, 118 (2d Cir. 2011). [4] United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2017, 1:59 pm
In her dissenting judgement in R (N) v Lewisham, Baroness Hale expressed puzzlement that that appeared to be the generally accepted view. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 2:34 am
The panel consisted of Lady Hale and Lords Clarke, Wilson, Carnwath and Hodge. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am
In the case of Ore v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Wilson gives the lead majority judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Carnwath agree. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The phrase marriage of convenience is “a term of art” in Lady Hale’s analysis. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
This is a live blog of the second and final day of the hearing of the appeal brought by the Scotch Whisky Association and others, concerning the lawfulness of the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
In response to a question from Lady Hale, Mr O’Neill QC states that affluence is based on household income. 1405: Mr Mr O’Neill QC refers to the Extra Division’s reference to figures produced by Sheffield University, which conclude that hazardous and harmful drinking are associated with affluence. 1405: Mr O’Neill QC notes that you can only know the least restrictive test if you are aware of the aim. 1400: The Court has returned. 1300: Court adjourns… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
For a recent example, check out McNeil v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Baroness Hale agreed with this. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
Moreover, Maaouia v France (2001) 33 EHRR 42 undid any art 6 grounds since civil rights had not been determined. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court judgment Baroness Hale gave the only judgment. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Both of these authorities were cited with apparent approval in Baroness Hale’s leading judgment in the Supreme Court: see paragraphs 20 and 30. [read post]
