Search for: "HALE v. STATE"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,075
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2016, 9:20 am
A few weeks ago, the Georgia Court of Appeals handed down an interesting decision in Baskin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:40 am
Supreme Court In a leapfrog appeal, the Supreme Court, comprising Lady Hale and Lords Kerr, Sumption, Hughes and Toulson, heard submissions on 26 and 27 January 2016. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am
The panel will be Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath and Lord Toulson. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:39 am
Supreme Court The appeal will be heard today by a panel of five judges comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Toulson. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 11:52 am
See McGuire, Craddock, Strother & Hale, P.C. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am
The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am
MP (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, The panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lords Kerr, Hughes, and Toulson. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger and Lady Hale also stated that even if the court had been able to find the possession order disproportionate to her rights under art 8, the appellant could not assume that this would have led to the order being refused. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
On 19 May 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in PJS v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2016] UKSC 26. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:40 am
Lady Hale did state that the Court had considerable sympathy for the situation in which the applicants find themselves and understood that this is something which concerns them deeply. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:32 am
See, Ari v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am
Lord Mance stated that the Court of Appeal had made an error of law by too closely assimilating the tort of invasion of privacy with a breach of confidence when it stated that “a claim for misuse of private information can and often will survive when information in is in the public domain. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:02 pm
As Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
As for the competing Convention rights (the family’s Article 8 rights to privacy and the importance of free press reporting under Article 10), the judge relied upon the ruling of the Supreme Court in R(C) v Secretary of State for Justice ([2016] UKSC 2) where Lady Hale observed: “First, neither article has as such precedence over the other. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 12:09 pm
They asked the Court to declare that one state cannot be haled into the courts of another state to answer for its official actions back home. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 10:37 am
The court held that Nevada cannot refuse to extend to other states haled into Nevada courts the same immunities Nevada enjoys without violating the constitutional Full Faith and Credit Clause [text]. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
A traditional trust is not a distinct legal entity at all, but rather a “fiduciary relationship” that could not be haled into court. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 2:01 pm
Here’s a nice personal jurisdiction decision (TV Azteca v. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 2:22 am
They stated that the Court had no hesitation in concluding that it should do so in the present case. [read post]
