Search for: "HOLDER v. BANKS"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,480
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 12:44 pm
The Privacy Commissioner has released the following case notes: In Own Motion Investigation v Financial Institution [2009] PrivCmrA 12 the Commissioner commenced an own motion investigation after being advised by an individual that a financial institution had been sending bank account statements to the previous occupant of the individual's residential address for several years, despite these statements consistently being returned, marked ‘Return to sender. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am
The foundational case is Lyus v Prowsa Developments [1982] 1 WLR 1044, but, as Lloyd LJ noted, there were three key points about that case: (a) Ms Lyus’ right didn’t bind the bank, which sold the property; (b) Ms Lyus’ right was specifically identified in the bank’s contract of sale; and (c) Ms Lyus could not have done any more to protect her right. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
In the B.C. decision of Chung v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 8:30 am
In the B.C. decision of Chung v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
College Savings Bank, 527 U.S. 627 (1999). [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 9:49 pm
Wells Fargo Bank, 2013-1588, -1589, 2014-1112, -1687 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 6:19 pm
In Miller, the Court held that bank records obtained from a bank pursuant to a subpoena were admissible against the bank depositor whose records had been seized. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:13 am
(See Black Acres Pure Trust v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 3:13 pm
Nat’l Bank & Trust Co., 607 N.E.2d 1337, 1345 (Ill. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am
In People v. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
"[W]hether a holder has accelerated a note is a fact question. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 4:15 am
Section 7(1) provides: “Where a public authority is listed in Schedule 1 only in relation to information of a specified description, nothing in Parts 1 to V of this Act applies to any other information held by the authority” Schedule 1 contains a long list of bodies, persons and office-holders. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Pew v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 12:11 pm
Last week, the NC Court of Appeals wrestled with the question whether a charging order operates as an assignment of an LLC interest, in First Bank v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 9:56 am
HSBC BANK USA, N.A. v CRUM No. 3:14-CV-3522-B USDC Tex. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:23 pm
Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
