Search for: "Hague v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2017, 10:58 am
” Hague Convention, art. 13(b). [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:14 pm
Respondent appealed the December 30, 2021 Order, and the Ninth Circuit remanded for consideration of the recently decided United States Supreme Court case Golan v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:14 am
" Blondin v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 10:17 am
The Court first clarified the construction of Art. 5 Hague Maintenance Protocol in relation to a pending divorce proceeding in which Austrian law applied, whereas the habitual residence of the claimant was situated in the United Kingdom. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
Anne Acosta the Respondent was citizen of the United States. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:07 pm
In Selo v. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 9:48 pm
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 4:48 am
State immunity in global COVID-19 pandemic: Alters, et. al. v People’s Republic of China, et. al. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:30 pm
In Burch v Burch, 2013 WL 1909472 (S.D.Ind.) [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:14 am
Press v. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 6:00 am
§ 9007(b)(3), petitioner is entitled to these costs as it was necessary for him (1) to fly to the United States, (2) stay 2 nights in order to attend the hearing, and (3) return with his children to Bermuda. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 9:35 am
On August 21, 2018, Petitioner “filed a Hague case in the State of California. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
ABTO and MZTO were both United States' citizens. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 pm
Saada were in the United States, Ms. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 7:04 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 7:29 am
” Robert v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:52 am
’ ” United States v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:28 am
She stated that she wanted to stay in the United States because her life in Chile was unstable. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 5:31 pm
Earlier coverage of Medellin v. [read post]
