Search for: "Hale v. Hale"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2017, 4:42 pm
Judgment of the Supreme Court Lord Sumption (with whom Lady Hale and Lords Neuberger, Clarke and Reed agreed) gave the judgment of the majority. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 6:33 am
In the case of Ore v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 1:05 am
Lord Wilson gives the lead majority judgment, with which Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Carnwath agree. [read post]
Case Comment: Sadovska & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 54
31 Jul 2017, 3:30 am
The phrase marriage of convenience is “a term of art” in Lady Hale’s analysis. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:59 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (2017 SCC 34). [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:56 am
This is a live blog of the second and final day of the hearing of the appeal brought by the Scotch Whisky Association and others, concerning the lawfulness of the Scottish Government’s plans to introduce minimum pricing for alcohol. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:35 am
In response to a question from Lady Hale, Mr O’Neill QC states that affluence is based on household income. 1405: Mr Mr O’Neill QC refers to the Extra Division’s reference to figures produced by Sheffield University, which conclude that hazardous and harmful drinking are associated with affluence. 1405: Mr O’Neill QC notes that you can only know the least restrictive test if you are aware of the aim. 1400: The Court has returned. 1300: Court adjourns… [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 1:00 am
The hand down panel will be Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Reed and Lord Hodge. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 10:58 am
For a recent example, check out McNeil v. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:46 am
The Supreme Court of Canada has issued its decision in Google Inc v Equustek (28 June 2017). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Baroness Hale agreed with this. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
Moreover, Maaouia v France (2001) 33 EHRR 42 undid any art 6 grounds since civil rights had not been determined. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
The Supreme Court judgment Baroness Hale gave the only judgment. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 9:03 am
Both of these authorities were cited with apparent approval in Baroness Hale’s leading judgment in the Supreme Court: see paragraphs 20 and 30. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
This is an important development, not least because the McInerney Homeshurdle is a high one (see, eg, SZ (Pakistan) v Minister for Justice [2013] IEHC 95 (01 March 2013); Nee v An Bord Pleanala [2013] IEHC 584 (29 October 2013); Kilarden Investments Ltd v Kirwans (Galway) Ltd [2013] IEHC 602 (01 November 2013); Rughoonauth v Minister for Justice [2017] IEHC 241 (24 April 2017); English… [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 7:00 am
In March 2017, the Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes) heard the appeal of the Metropolitan Police Service (“MPS”) in the case of Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v DSD & Anor. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 2:46 am
As demonstrated by Mamatkulov v Turkey (2005) 41 EHRR 25, DFAL’s criterion of serious irreversible harm shows some intersection with the ECtHR’s application of rule 39 relief. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]
