Search for: "Harrington v. Harrington" Results 421 - 440 of 657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2010, 4:39 am by Stephen Page
The court reaffirmed the principles of when a lawyer might be required to pay costs:In Cassidy v Murray the Full Court also set out the principles relevant to the exercise of the jurisdiction to award costs against a lawyer under the Act. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:39 am by Adam Chandler
”) At the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood writes about a petition that has been relisted twice, Harrington v. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 5:21 pm
“Through the trial the defendants demonstrated a failure to accept the claim construction governing this case. . . . they essentially urged the jury to adopt an interpretation of the patent claims developed by their experts instead of the construction mandated by the Federal Circuit,” wrote Judge Edward Harrington, ordering a $10 million penalty plus some attorneys fees against Medtronic, in Depuy v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
Congratulations to Deputy Assistant AG Sarah Harrington, who argued for the appellees. [read post]
6 May 2012, 10:20 am by Benjamin Wittes
He speaks to that briefly, and turns, at long last, to the arraignment of the accused in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am by Bradley R. Hall, E.D. Mich.
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:27 pm by Stephen Page
Stephen Page, Harrington Family Lawyers, Brisbane spage@harringtonfamilylawyers.com 61(7) 3221 9544 [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:19 am by James Bickford
In reversing that decision, the Court quoted at length from Harrington v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 12:01 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Thomas 13-775Issue: Whether federal habeas courts should apply Harrington v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 1:09 pm by Kate Howard
Sellers 16-6855 Issue: Whether the court’s decision in Harrington v. [read post]