Search for: "Hernandez v. District Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 660
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
See Demahy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 5:00 am
An excerpt: In a dramatic move, the state Supreme Court depublished two of those rulings — Lamps Plus Overtime Cases, 195 Cal.App.4th 389, and Hernandez v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 3:37 am
The Supreme Court of Virginia recently considered (Kelley v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:29 am
It joins Lamps Plus Overtime Cases (8/20/12) (discussed here); and Hernandez v. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 11:23 am
Hernandez v. [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 10:12 am
The court held that RLUIPA did not support his claim for damages, and his claim for injunctive relief was moot.In Hernandez v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 6:49 am
Supreme Court decided in Padilla v. [read post]
18 Nov 2012, 7:00 am
The district court denied the defense request for surrebuttal; Maloney was convicted. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 8:41 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed today in Hernandez v. [read post]
14 Nov 2012, 5:15 pm
The Fourth District Court ruled today in Hernandez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 6:45 am
The judge -- District Judge Marco A. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
”16 But these four district courts represent the minority view, and no appellate court that I could find has ever agreed. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:30 am
On October 1, 2012, the Southern District of Florida issued its opinion in the case Hernandez v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:46 am
App. 4th 35 (2012) Hernandez v. [read post]
22 Sep 2012, 2:49 pm
Hernandez, No. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Sept. 5, 2012) Hernandez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 9:39 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
As the Court observed in Salinas, “When Congress uses well-settled terminology of criminal law, its words are presumed to have their ordinary meaning and definition. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 6:22 am
The District Court found that the children were wrongfully retained by Respondent. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
Another question is why the District Court didn't suppress. [read post]
