Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner" Results 421 - 440 of 3,492
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Mishcon de Reya blog also published an article on FoIs last week, explaining the recent decision of Moss v Kingston-on-Thames and The Information Commissioner NJ/2018/0007, in which the High Court held that failure to comply with a FoI notice is contempt of court. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:22 pm by John E. Villafranco
” I heard something similar from Commissioner Wilson, in her concurring opinion in Resident Home. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 4:26 am by INFORRM
In her Human Rights Comment of 27 October 2020 “Time to take action against SLAPPs” the Commissioner,Dunja Mijatović, called for effective action to be taken against SLAPPs as a matter of urgency (link). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:43 am by Jocelyn Hutton
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 28/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 2:38 am by CMS
In this post, Andre Anthony, a senior associate in the Tax team at CMS, comments on the decision of the UK Supreme Court in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another [2022] UKSC 9. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
On 10 March 2022, the Information Commissioner’s Office issued a monetary penalty notice to a professional services firm in the sum of £98,000 for a breach of Article 5(1)(f) of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). [read post]
26 Mar 2022, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
It is not as if in motion cases there is no evidence of harm to reputation: the plaintiff will provide evidence of harm in her affidavit. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:46 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Odeon Associated Theatres Ltd v Jones [1971] 1 WLR 442 and cases following it have established that the profit of a taxpayer’s trade is to be determined in accordance with “ordinary principles of commercial accountancy”. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:14 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 23rd March the Court will hand down judgment in Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs v NCL Investments Ltd and another, on appeal from 2020 EWCA Civ 663. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 12:14 pm by Rebecca Plevel
In her time on the Federal District Court, Judge Childs has ruled on a variety of cases, including Bradacs v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: (As of 16/3/22) The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA and Ors, heard 4 May 2021 East of England Ambulance Service NHS Trust v Flowers and Ors, heard 22 June 2021 Basfar v Wong, heard 13th-14th October … [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner John Edwards said it is important employees report any suspicious emails, the Guardian reports. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
Commissioner of Correction (Habeas; due process rights; testimony at trial; finding of the habeas court that no agreement or understanding existed between the state and person who testified with respect to her testimony) [read post]