Search for: "Herring v. Edwards" Results 421 - 440 of 2,021
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
This decision is interesting to the AmeriKat in light of Henry Carr J's recent decision in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158 in May where it was made clear that the preliminary injunction test is a series of gateways (see Kat report here). [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 2:00 am by Ben
Gray's team argued that there had been many opportunities for Perry and her co-writers to to have heard 'Joyful Noise' and argued that whilst the copying may not have been deliberate,  her team had subconsciously infringed the earlier work. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:00 am by James Kachmar
”  In 2008, the California Supreme Court, in Edwards v. [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Edwards on behalf of the estate of the late Arthur Watkins v Hugh James Ford Simey Solicitors was heard on 25th July. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
 Her legal defense has noted that the cyber libel law under which she is being prosecuted was enacted four months after the story in question was published in 2012, The Guardian reported. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 11:41 am by Eric Goldman
Personnel note: the Russian troll’s lawyers are Dennis Edward Boyle and Blerina Jasari of Whiteford Taylor and Preston LLP and Christopher Daniel Sullivan of Diamond McCarthy LLP. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 8:20 am by Eugene Volokh
"[V]igorous participation in athletic activities" would be deterred. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 12:21 pm by Jacques Singer-Emery, Patrick McDonnell
After recessing for lunch and prayer, Cheryl Bormann, counsel for defendant Walid bin Attash, began her line of questioning. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
That “Mylius” advice was repeated in 1937 by the Attorney General, Sir Donald Somervell, in respect of Edward VIII during Wallis Simpson’s divorce from her husband. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Nonetheless, promises not to speak are legally binding (see Cohen v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
 Canada (Attorney General) in 1993, and Sauvé v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 12:26 am by Tessa Shepperson
  Her lawyer Mike McIlvaney, has published a detailed chronology of her battle to obtain legal aid. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]