Search for: "Higgins v. Higgins" Results 421 - 440 of 518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2018, 7:17 am by Joy Waltemath
The majority explained that the language used in Punt was quoted from the First Circuit’s decision in Higgins v. [read post]
31 May 2017, 6:50 pm by Jon
They don't have a Henry Higgins to coach them. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 7:01 am by Inga Kristina Trauthig
Eliot Higgins, founder of Bellingcat, described the video as “the laziest, dumbest disinformation I’ve seen in forever. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 7:50 am by INFORRM
   His counsel Paul O’Higgins SC argued that while the papers had argued the publicity was in the public interest to prevent him re-offending, it had to be asked was the public interest better served by allowing him to have a home and build a life. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 6:08 am
Freed and Karl Sandstrom, Center for Political Accountability, on Wednesday, September 14, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Agency costs, Campaign finance, Citizens United v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am by INFORRM
Those reports rightly point to the €1,250,000 damages award in Leech v Independent Newspapers [2014] IESC 79 (19 December 2014). [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 6:07 am
House of Representatives, on Saturday, November 17, 2018 Tags: Banks, Capital formation, Community Reinvestment Act, Credit supply, Financial institutions, Financial regulation, OCC, Small firms, US House Drafting Considerations from the MAC Decision Posted by Gail Weinstein, Steven Epstein, Matthew V. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia The judge in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case has asked if Brittany Higgins should be recalled to give evidence over alleged ‘false representations’ in her $2.4m compensation payout. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am by Schachtman
In the Celebrex/Bextra litigation, both sides acknowledged the general acceptance and validity of meta-analysis, for both observational studies and clinical trials, but attacked the other side’s witnesses’ meta-analyses on grounds specific to how they were conducted. [read post]