Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 63,722
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2009, 1:01 am
US_CLASSIFIED_COVERSHEETS.GIF In case involving the "extraordinary rendition program," Ninth Circuit reverses dismissal of civil action based on third party government intervenor's claim of state secrets privilege; judicial role, premised on Marbury v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:21 am
United States, 550 U.S. ___ (2007) (holding attempted burglary a violent felony under ACCA's residual clause), from which he had dissented. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 10:33 am
State of Hawaii, No. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:22 am
In today’s United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2020, 8:00 am
” Tullis v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 12:41 am
" Citing Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:04 pm
Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals will hear oral argument in the case of United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 3:29 pm
Hall, 440 U.S. 410 (1979), and hold that the Eleventh Amendment bars states from being sued by individuals in the courts of their sister states. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, and United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:30 am
Anyway, the case is State of Nevada v. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 4:30 am
Here is the abstract: Critics have observed that the Supreme Court’s decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
August 2, 2019 Double Jeopardy, State v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 10:59 am
That clause holds: “[N]o State . . . shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 12:26 pm
Shatzer today - limiting its 1981 holding in Edwards v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am
State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:00 am
Ned Hillenbrand (J.D. 2012, Washington & Lee), Note, United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 12:24 pm
The US Supreme Court Monday held unanimously in Siegel v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
Whether an Article 134 clause 1 or 2 Specification that fails to expressly allege either potential terminal element states an offense under the Supreme Court’s holdings in United States v. [read post]
