Search for: "Holding v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 69,726
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
Bd., 64 F3d 184, 188 [5th Cir 1995], citing Tinker v Des Moines Indep. [read post]
9 May 2024, 5:55 am
Second, based on the first conclusion, and as established by the ICJ in Bosnia v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 4:25 am
Beavers v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 am
Sharp v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 9:01 pm
The agency’s more cautious approach to the designation of Russian oligarchs was surely a deliberate decision, likely taken in light of the extensive multinational commercial holdings of many oligarchs and the companies they control and the potential for disruption of markets outside Russia. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:05 pm
In 1989 in Michael H. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:58 pm
If the Doe holding extends beyond pseudonyms to docket entries, Mr. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:09 pm
Zircon Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:17 am
Regarding the possible consequences of Brexit, de la Tour drew two sets of conclusions from the fact that the applicant still holds Romanian nationality. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:25 pm
Conventional wisdom holds that this is also true within the government’s third branch, with the liberal justices of the United States Supreme Court championing the work of the press while their conservative colleagues threaten to erode its protections. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:04 pm
Mendoza v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 11:44 am
Seilkop v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 10:44 am
(Or at least the best one that doesn't take up 20,000+ words.)The California Supreme Court has to wade into all this in deciding this opinion, which holds that, in this particular context, the required mental state of "knowing" is belied by a good faith belief in the legality of one's conduct. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:47 am
In Pulsifer v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am
Source: USPTO Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:12 am
Per another Supreme Court precedent, United States v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]