Search for: "Hook v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 723
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2013, 6:55 am by Michelle Yeary
  To the contrary, the absolute language of §337(a) (“all such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter shall be by and in the name of the United States”), is exactly what wasn’t present in TISA. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm by Courtney Minick
Said and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:05 am by Tom Webley
The plaintiffs’ bar has therefore tried to find federal and state privacy laws, with associated statutory or liquidated damage hooks, in an attempt to avoid dismissal for lack of harm. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 8:17 am by Gritsforbreakfast
The New Jersey court unanimously stepped up to say what Justice Sonia Sotomayor suggested in a lone concurrence in US v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
The United States Senate recently passed a bill, which is now under consideration in the House of Representatives, requiring on-line retailers to collect use tax on behalf of states whose residents are failing to pay the use tax when they make an out-of-state purchase using the internet. [read post]
3 May 2013, 8:56 am by Ben Rubin
An eminent decision out of the Ninth Circuit United States Court of Appeals is not a common occurrence. [read post]
3 May 2013, 3:57 am by Steve Vladeck
Next Thursday, the Supreme Court will decide whether or not to grant certiorari in United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 2:16 pm
Last month, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, issued an opinion in the case of Markel American Insurance Company v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
In other words, if you use a WMD against a person or property in the United States, and there's an interstate commerce hook to provide a justification for federal jurisdiction, it's a federal crime. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 12:50 pm by Ken White
In other words, if you use a WMD against a person or property in the United States, and there's an interstate commerce hook to provide a justification for federal jurisdiction, it's a federal crime. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:01 am by Joe Consumer
  In Wyeth v Levine, the Court pointed out that “Congress did not intend FDA oversight to be the exclusive means of ensuring drug safety and effectiveness’ and that state law serves as a ‘complementary form of drug regulation. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Co. (1933, Mont.) 26 P2d 175 [periodic immersion of injured hand into hot water]; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (1919 Neb.) 173 NW 689 [x-ray procedure requiring injection of contrast substance into the kidney]; Cardinal v. [read post]