Search for: "Hudson v. US Government" Results 421 - 440 of 604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Kendal on Hudson, 157 A.D.3d 746, 747, 68 N.Y.S.3d 491, 492 (2d Dep’t 2018) (explaining courts may determine material contract term using “objective extrinsic event, condition, or standard” referenced within contract itself). [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 5:25 am
" There were no barriers in US TM law, because of decisions like 1968's Chanel v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 5:07 am by SHG
Supreme Court was poised to decide the question whether corporate image advertising is commercial speech in Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2009, 12:51 am
Weissman argued that for nearly a century, judges, prosecutors and defense lawyers had misconstrued a 1909 Supreme Court decision, called New York Central and Hudson River Railroad v. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
If it’s to accomplish some other purpose, then ordinary First Amendment scrutiny should apply, not the more relaxed Central Hudson standard. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 pm by Seyfarth Shaw
  The Court applied the four-prong intermediate scrutiny test set forth in Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 3:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
The panel’s two-to-one decision in Aamer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 5:59 am by Kevin LaCroix
[ii] In its Complaint, Hudson named Chicago Pacific Founders Fund, L.P. [read post]