Search for: "Human v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 19,535
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
On 12 October 2010 the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights, presided over by English judge Sir Nicholas Bratza, gave judgment in the Article 10 case of Saaristo v Finland. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 6:33 am
Chakrabarty: the patentability of human genes. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 7:19 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
United States Patent and Trademark Office, et al. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Post, The Courts on Climate Change and Fundamental Rights Arnon Gutfeld, Cantwell v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
HM (Iraq) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1536 (13 December 2011) December 13, 2011 Iraq country guidance immigration tribunal decision quashed as 2 parties not represented. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 4:02 am
School Dist. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 2012 NY Slip Op 04668, Court of Appeals Is a public school district an "education corporation or association" within the meaning of  Executive Law §296(4)? [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:36 am by Adam Wagner
Whilst the law may have changed in spite of the Human Rights Act, it is notable that in the United States, where there is no constitutionally enshrined right to privacy, private phone hacking is not as strictly regulated. [read post]
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in TN, MA and AA (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2015] UKSC 40, in which the Court held that a breach of the family tracing duty in Regulation 6 of the Asylum Seekers (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2005 does not affect the rule in Ravichandran requiring asylum applications to be decided on the facts existing at the date of decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 4:41 pm
It ultimately concludes that horizontal processes can be effective in filling the enforcement gaps of vertical institutions and in affecting state human rights behavior. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained to state a claim for retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296], the plaintiff must show: 1. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division explained to state a claim for retaliation under the New York State Human Rights Law [Executive Law §296], the plaintiff must show: 1. [read post]