Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF B. M. R., A CHILD" Results 421 - 440 of 552
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2010, 5:50 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Kanter was not entitled to a referral fee in the Tara M. case due to a impermissible conflict of interest resulting from her appointment as guardian ad litem and guardian of the estate of the child; 3) struck the trial court’s additur to the compensatory damages award; 4) reversed the award of punitive damages against Appellees; 5) vacated the award of fines for contempt; and 6) eliminated the award of attorneys’ fees to Ms. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:39 pm by Eric S. Solotoff
  In fact, the Child Support Guidelines includes, but is not limited to 23 possibilities for income, as follows: a. compensation for services, including wages, fees, tips, and commissions; b. the operation of a business minus ordinary and necessary operating expenses (see IRS Schedule C); c. gains derived from dealings in property; d. interest and dividends (see IRS Schedule B); e. rents (minus ordinary and necessary expenses - see IRS Schedule E); f.… [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 35.150(d), are enforceable by private right of action.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's replyAmicus brief for Disability Rights Advocates et al.Amicus brief for Richard M. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 7:01 am by Jordan Furlong
Family lawyers could provide information on why spousal support is usually mandatory and defining the “best interests of the child. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am by Joseph C. McDaniel
I'm reproducing the Automatic Stay Statute, located at 11 USC 362, below. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:19 pm by David Lat
In all seriousness, this is an interesting question. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 5:40 am by Maxwell Kennerly
David Fincher started inquiring about my interest in scoring his upcoming film, The Social Network. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am by Susan Brenner
Employers like BCES possess a legitimate interest in the efficient operation of the workplace and . . . [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:45 am by J
After considering two previous High Court decisions, Arnold J held, at [50] that the power to enforce a charging order (i.e. by order for sale) was, in principle, compatible with the Convention and that (at least in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996) any obligation on the court was discharged by considering the factors specified in s.15, 1996 Act: (a) the intention of the parties who created the trust; (b) the purpose for which the property is held;… [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:45 am by J
After considering two previous High Court decisions, Arnold J held, at [50] that the power to enforce a charging order (i.e. by order for sale) was, in principle, compatible with the Convention and that (at least in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996) any obligation on the court was discharged by considering the factors specified in s.15, 1996 Act: (a) the intention of the parties who created the trust; (b) the purpose for which the property is held;… [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Gibbs, Deputy Mayor for Education and Community Development Dennis M. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:02 pm by Adam Thierer
  I’m not so sure, although it’s hard to find a metric to compare them in an analytically rigorous fashion. [read post]