Search for: "IN THE MATTER OF THE REINSTATEMENT OF FORTH" Results 421 - 440 of 478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2009, 11:37 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Most Cited CasesPerformance of an agreement by payment of money alone is not enough, as a matter of law, to take the agreement out of the statute of frauds. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 4:01 pm by Law Lady
D7aEmployment discrimination -- Speech -- Public employees -- Retaliation -- Assistant state attorney who was responsible for prosecuting homicide cases within Office of State Attorney filed single-count action under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 against defendants, who had supervisory authority and responsibility for discipline of personnel within SAO, alleging his suspension without pay was in retaliation for exercise of his First Amendment rights to free expression in posting on his blog a memo he had… [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 5:21 pm
This morning, I go forth to do the right thing, because it is the right thing. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 1:44 pm by Robert Ambrogi
"Executive session", any part of a meeting of a public body closed to the public for deliberation of certain matters. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 4:10 am
Under the facts of this case -- where the termination was sought prior to the resolution of the criminal charges -- "a summary proceeding is not enough to comport with due process as there is no procedure in place to apply for reinstatement following the conclusion of the criminal matter; even were it to end favorably for [Cravatta]. [read post]
27 May 2009, 10:02 am
And arguments that the dissolution and reinstatement shouldn't matter fail, the court said, because the employment agreement didn't specify that it should survive a dissolution. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
The new chief of the Antitrust Division, Christine Varney, today published an advance text of a speech she gave yesterday at the Center for American Progress. [read post]
11 May 2009, 4:15 am
.'"* With respect to Acosta's claim seeking reinstatement and back pay, the Appellate Division found that Acosta "was not directly employed by the Department of Education but by an independent agency under contract to the Department," and remanded the matter to Supreme Court "for further proceedings to fashion an appropriate remedy in accord with [its] decision. [read post]
10 May 2009, 12:27 pm
Further: The essential point is that the landlord did redecorate the main bedroom, did re-hang the curtains and did reinstate some, at least, of their furniture. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:29 am
I get the feeling the Geithner's rope has been shortened on these matters. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 1:23 pm
On February 10, 2009, the Panel issued an Order which stated that the Panel reviewed Claimants' February 9, 2009, opt-out Notice and found that the Notice meets the requirements of Rule 12204(b)(2), and accordingly, reinstated the case. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:53 am
Defendants conceded that it was error not to poll the jury, yet urged that harmless error analysis saved the verdict.A divided panel of the First Department, Appellate Division, agreed with the defendants and reinstated the verdict. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
"The relevant CBA specifically stated that no permanent employee "may be disciplined without just cause" and set forth a detailed, four-step grievance procedure for resolving disputes. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
Supreme Court has twice denied petitions for certiorari to hear such matters, and bills to address reverse payment settlements have been introduced, but stalled, in Congress. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:48 am
Supreme Court has twice denied petitions for certiorari to hear such matters, and bills to address reverse payment settlements have been introduced, but stalled, in Congress. [read post]