Search for: "In Interest of C."
Results 421 - 440
of 41,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
C. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:28 pm
In recent days there has been massive new interest in Canadian copyright reform as thousands of people write to their MPs to express concern about the prospect of adding SOPA-style rules to Bill C-11 (there are even plans for public protests beginning to emerge). [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:14 pm
Example 1(c). [read post]
12 May 2008, 3:11 am
He's providing news of interest to patent practitioners in Quebec and Canada. [read post]
21 May 2010, 8:34 am
Below is a link to a very interesting article about California’s harsh “three strikes” law and its perhaps unintended consequences. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:33 pm
§ 924(c). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 8:06 am
From How Appealing Blog, with an interesting note re new Appellate Rule 29(c)(5).... [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:41 am
An interesting article yesterday in the Indianapolis Star business section reported by Bruce C. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 7:05 am
When a C corporation is up for sale, the tax law pits the interests of the buyer against the seller.... [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 3:20 am
News release from U of C, plus videos for those who might be interested. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:19 pm
§ 44‑1201(A).C. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:38 am
Michael, 576 F.3d 323 (6th Cir. 2009) (discussed somewhere in this blog), and agrees that the crack ratio is incorporated in the CO GL (b/c maximum sentences set CO base offense levels). * Remand necessary, so dist ct can consider varying from CO GL based on flawed crack ratio. * Interesting discussion of United State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 8:05 am
(c) Answer to Issue: No. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 7:01 am
Category (c) has been explained this way by the Texas Supreme Court, in the 1942 case, Drane v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 9:51 am
That principle applies to any procedure which may result in a decision by a EU institution perceptibly affecting a person’s interests (see Case C? [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 5:12 am
The IRS interest rates are compounded daily. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 6:49 am
§§36-6-101(a)(2)(B) and (C). [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Orley C. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 8:19 am
W appealed the T/C's exclusion from the marital estate of H's partnership interest in... [read post]
