Search for: "In Re: Amendments To The Florida Family Law Rules" Results 421 - 440 of 461
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2009, 11:01 am by Terry Lenamon
The High Court ruled that the death penalty was "arbitrary and capricious," violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution because of a variation between state laws and the application of the punishment itself. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Israel Versace 83 LTD. v Gianni Versace SPA – the saga continues (IP Factor) Israel Magistrate Court throws out family disagreement, ruling IP related issues take it out of his jurisdiction (IP Factor) The boundaries of patentability: conference at Israel Yaffa Conference Centre (IP Factor)   Italy Tribunale di Milano on little black horse in shield on red background; upholds Ferrari’s infringement claim (Class 46) Alfa forced to drop… [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am by smtaber
Army Corps of Engineers violated federal environmental laws by failing to give the public enough of a say before issuing permits for mountaintop removal coal mines in West Virginia, a federal judge ruled Tuesday. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 8:38 pm by Tom
Nov. 12, 2009). 2 In re Amendments, No. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 10:04 pm
Related posts:Implications of Electronic Communication on Family Law LitigationCan Blogs Influence the Supreme Court? [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 8:11 pm
Photo credit: amandabhslater Intriguing exhibitions If you’re wanting to see new law then the blawgosphere will not disappoint. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:24 am
The Florida Supreme Court released the following court rule opinions:Opinions Released Mar. 19, 2009SC08_1612 - In re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSC08_2176 - In re: Approval of Application for Determination of Indigent Status Form For Use By Clerks and Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.984Opinions Released Mar. 5, 2009OP_SC08_1488 - In Re: Standard Jury… [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we reverse the court's ruling and order the injunction vacated. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 3:34 am
  The case had been up to the Supreme Court twice before; this time the Court simply denied certiorari, letting stand the 3rd Circuit’s decision affirming the trial court’s decision that the law violated the 1st Amendment. [read post]
28 Dec 2008, 8:36 pm by Jared Beck
Beck has a law degree from Harvard Law School, and practices law in the courts of South Florida. [read post]
30 Nov 2008, 12:41 am
Significantly, the committee note explains that the 1996 amendment to the rule “does not abrogate prior case law holding that a party's right of appeal arises when there is a termination of judicial labor on the issue involved as to that party. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 3:10 am
Since retail businesses that collect large amounts of cash are often exempt from the $10,000 rule, launderers have created front companies or collaborated with employees of such outlets as 7 Elevens and Computer-Land stores. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:09 am
DeCarr and her family moved from that residence over ayear before, weeks after Lisa disappeared. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 1:00 pm
” With the wide disparity of laws from state to state, the inconsistency can leave families in legal limbo without a way to dissolve a legal relationship. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 3:20 pm
Mejia, No. 052856, 056683, 061744 Convictions for conspiracy to commit assaults with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering activity, and discharge of a firearm during a crime of violence are vacated where: 1) the testimony of the Government expert witness violated the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment; and 2) that error was not harmless. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:25 pm
Horn, No. 03-9010, 03-9011 In a capital-murder case, petition for a writ of habeas corpus is granted where: 1) the time period for filing the petition was tolled during state-court proceedings, and the federal petition was therefore timely; 2) the state fugitive-forfeiture rule did not apply to procedurally default the petition; 3) the jury instructions and verdict sheet that were used during the penalty phase of petitioner's trial denied him due process of law pursuant to… [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
After reviewing the facts of the case and pertinent law, we reverse the court's ruling and order the injunction vacated. [read post]