Search for: "In Re Duke" Results 421 - 440 of 2,036
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2008, 10:06 am
  Other signers included professors from law schools nationwide, including Duke, Cleveland-Marshall, Seton Hall, Georgetown and Emory. [read post]
9 Sep 2007, 3:04 pm
""Yes, we're both in the right, and to keep us from being irrevocably aware of it, hadn't we better go our separate ways home? [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:57 am by Paul Karlsgodt
SELLERS: Well, Justice Scalia, I –I — I want to deal with the — in this instance, we have — it’s not just any old analysis that we’re -that we’re using. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 8:48 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
[This is a guest post by Reference Librarian and Senior Lecturing Fellow Marguerite Most.]Whether you're returning to Duke after a summer away, or you're new to Duke Law School and just beginning your legal career, you'll soon learn that a new 20th edition of The Bluebook has arrived. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 9:55 am
November was a relatively light month in the case, with politics taking center stage:North Carolina's senior senator, Republican Elizabeth Dole, lost her bid for re-election. [read post]
16 May 2007, 8:23 pm
  Sadly, I will not be able to attend as I am going to take a little bit of a paper grading/ battery re-charge vacation for the next few weeks before starting my full-time tour of duty at the Commission. [read post]
4 May 2012, 8:41 am by Pierre Bergeron
Dukes 131 Supreme Court 2541 (2011), the Sixth Circuit walked through the various class action requirements and concluded that the district court did not abuse its discretion in certifying the class. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 8:25 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
  After an initial denial of class certification, the case was re-framed to seek only injunctive relief, and certification was again denied. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am by Dean Gonsowski
And finally, even assuming that the FRCP is magically re-jiggered to ease preservation costs, this would only impact organizations with litigation in Federal court. [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 1:06 pm by K&L Gates
  The Subcommittee also recommends that the proposed language be largely re-written and that the rule be divided into four parts. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Last week I mentioned Dukes and Concepcion, now pending before the U.S. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 9:51 am by Dean Gonsowski
And finally, even assuming that the FRCP is magically re-jiggered to ease preservation costs, this would only impact organizations with litigation in Federal court. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 2:42 pm
  The following entry is by Professor Ernie Young of Duke Law School. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:44 am by Jason Rantanen
By Jason Rantanen Saurabh Vishnubhakat (Texas A&M), Arti Rai (Duke) and Jay Kesan (Illinois) recently released a draft of their empirical study of Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceedings, Strategic Decision Making in Dual PTAB and District Court Proceedings. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:14 pm
He has also taught at the Duke University and Villanova University Schools of Law. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:40 am by Rob Howse
  On this as on many other matters, re-reading my much missed late colleague Ronnie Dworkin is very instructive. [read post]