Search for: "In Re EG" Results 421 - 440 of 821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2021, 6:33 am by Anna Carrier (BE)
Finally, ESMA explains limited instances where data providers may impose a charge for delayed data, eg. a delayed data user re-distributes the delayed data for a fee or creates value-added services using that data which are then sold for a fee to third parties. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 12:01 pm by Lewis Gainor
Re-entering the United States illegally after deportation. 8 USC 1326(a). [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:42 am
Re-consider your company's SIC code to ensure it properly fits your company. [read post]
12 May 2015, 3:18 am by Siobhan Hayes and Indeg Kerr
This should include assessing the costs and benefits of improving energy efficiency and weighing these against options to market the property and/or to re-gear the lease. [read post]
27 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
After weeks of flirting Drew then sent her message which said: "You're a shitty person, and the world would be a better place without you in it. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 2:32 am by Sonya Zywko (UK)
  Such cases provide good reason for regulated firms in particular to re-visit their communications and monitoring policies around the use of WhatsApp, although this article considers the position whether or not a firm is regulated. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 7:45 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
And we both know that’s not what you’re doing: you’re grabbing the M&Ms and leaving the Mike and Ikes behind. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:09 am by rachel@masslomap.org
You’ll continue to think you understand all you can, and you won’t know what you’re missing. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 12:27 pm by Russell Knight
Once a child is 18, they are no longer a child and parenting time orders no longe “[T]he age of majority in Illinois is 18” In re EG, 549 NE 2d 322 – Ill: Supreme Court 1989 “Minor” means a person…under the age of 18 years” 750 ILCS 30/3-1 “In Illinois, a child who attains the age of 18 years is of legal age. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
Last week, the Paris Court Appeal ruled (decision No 152/2019) in favour of the estate of late French photographer Jean-François Bauret in proceedings brought against, inter alia, US artist Jeff Koons (an artist who, as readers will know, has been sued a few times for copyright infringement: see, eg, here, here, and here). [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 5:30 am by Ben
 In its decision the Paris Court of Appeal suggested that both intent and effect might fall within the concept of ‘expression of humour or mockery’ when it stated that: “La parodie doit aussi présenter un caractère humoristique, faire oeuvre de raillerie ou provoquer le rire” (“The parody must also have a humorous character, make fun of or provoke laughter”). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 11:06 am by Derek T. Muller
" He worried, "It is just not, it seems a palatable answer to say the ruling was based on the fact that EG was greater than 7 percent. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 3:22 am
  I gather that wording similar to this top-up provision may also have been in some recent earlier drafts of the new Directive, but it is not now and the published Directive proposal seems pretty fixed on the "means-what-it-says" principle right across the board, eg at Article 40(5) (see below for the text). [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
In a time when use and re-use of artworks is ubiquitous, we can expect interesting developments in this regard. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:45 am
This is an issue that has re-surfaced from time to time. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 4:03 am
 In sum, according to its statutes the EU obviously lacks a mandate to render new meanings to the text of the Berne Convention, or offer lofty re-interpretations of it. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 1:58 am
What's not clear to this blogger is whether compliance with Nagoya is going to cause real problems in practice or whether it's a bit like a giant iceberg that will have melted into little ice cubes by the time it hits your dinghy.If you're booking for this event, you may spot that C5's pricing schemes are a bit complex for a fictional Kat to get his head round, but some discounts are available to suitably designated souls. [read post]
1 May 2013, 6:33 am
  If we face facts, neither the German decision nor ReDigi bring us any legal surprises – in fact they’re pretty predictable given the legal landscapes on both sides of the Atlantic. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
The T-shirts commercialized by the defendant company, in which Audrey Hepburn is represented with her middle finger up or covered in tattoos or with big chewing-gum bubbles, were very successful, and even the orders placed by the claimants were actioned late due to the need of re-stocking the items.The cease-and-desist letters sent by Hepburn's sons were devoid of effect. [read post]