Search for: "In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge" Results 421 - 440 of 1,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am by Schachtman
  In In re Silica, the prospect of creating a mass tort out of whole cloth seems to have had just such a distorting influence.[12] As noted by Judge Jack, in making the reliability inquiry, the trial judge has the responsibility “to make certain that an expert … employs in the courtroom the same level of intellectual rigor that characterizes the practice of an expert in the relevant field. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 4:55 am by Beth Graham
On Friday, the Supreme Court of Texas overruled its 2004 decision in In re Wood on the issue of arbitrability. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 2:02 pm by Schachtman
  Judge Johnson first distinguished himself in In re Accutane, No. 271(MCL), 2015 WL 753674, 2015 BL 59277 (N.J.Super. [read post]
The respondent had argued that the Supreme Court decision in In Re McCaughey’s Application for Judicial Review [2011] UKSC 20, [2012] 1 AC 725 needed to be considered in the light of the Grand Chamber’s observations in Janowiec v Russia (55508/07) (2014) 58 EHRR 30. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:14 am by Kevin Smith, J.D.
  Usually, the use inquiry focuses on how the defendant is using the work, but here the judge looked at how Righthaven was exploiting the copyright solely as a means for bringing lawsuits. [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:48 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Res Judicata   Res judicata was considered by the trial judge twice in his reasons. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 11:27 pm by Tessa Shepperson
The owners want to re-develop the estate with less social housing and more private housing sold to make a profit. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
We’re not saying that’s the case with Apple, but if the burden is not the guiding inquiry under the All Writs Act, that would suggest that the burden can be irrelevant in cases in which the necessity is sufficiently clear. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 9:12 pm by lawmrh
A court’s overriding concern must be to safeguard public confidence in the judiciary. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:50 am by Russ Bensing
  The problem in Santiago, of course, is the timing:  the judge’s inquiry didn’t come until after imposition of sentence. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”Deference has been especially prevalent in cases concerning decisions not to prosecute—cases in which courts have resisted issuing writs of mandamus requiring prosecution. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 6:31 am by SHG
That’s the nature of guilty pleas, that they end the inquiry. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 1:35 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
The appropriate inquiry is if a confidential relationship existed, did the parties deal on terms and conditions of equality? [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am by INFORRM
  In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting an updated version of  this series from last year on the way ahead for privacy law. [read post]