Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,239
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2013, 11:34 am
A case that comes to mind is In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Nov. 15, 1993, 846 F.Supp. 11 (S.D.N.Y. 1994) (Mukasey, J.). [read post]
31 May 2016, 10:36 am
Positive Software, 619 F.3d at 460; In re FEMA Trailer, 401 F. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:24 pm
If NSA's got that technology, they're not sharing. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 6:32 pm
"We're talking about the most horrendous crimes one can imagine and it deserves the harshest penalty possible," Blunt said. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:35 am
AND NORMA KERR, ET AL., No. 13-0303 . [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:36 pm
It depends what state you're in. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 2:46 pm
First, conservatives had the following responses to why liberals have liberal views: They lack the right values. 24% They lack the right religious beliefs. 8.0% They’re not as smart as conservatives. 8.0% Liberals tend to engage in “groupthink. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 4:05 am
Despite my admiration for Orin Kerr's mix of scholarship and practicality, one area where I disagree strongly with him is his "technology neutral" approach to search and seizure, where he essentially seeks to apply the law developed over the years to deal with brick and mortar, car chases and snail mail, to the digital world by analogy. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm
Di Re, 332 U. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 2:35 pm
Thanks to activist Noah Newkirk, we’ve recently been reminded that federal law makes it a crime to “make a harangue or oration, or utter loud, threatening, or abusive language in the Supreme Court Building or grounds” (at least if you’re not a justice or a litigant). [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:19 pm
Orin Kerr)]2. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 7:53 am
We're setting up for a Bush v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 6:55 pm
And I’d add a third reason: if judges’ can freely express their discomfort with the law they’re upholding and the rules they’re upholding it under, it reduces the temptation they might have to distort the law so as to not be seen as endorsing the law and the underlying doctrine. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:28 pm
For example, I won't have it be writing my bio any time soon. pic.twitter.com/2b8H01jzxG — Orin Kerr (@OrinKerr) January 13, 2023 To correct the errors in the ChatGPT output, I joined Berkeley in 2019, not 2018; I didn't go to Yale Law School; I didn't clerk for Judge O'Scannlain; I wasn't an appellate lawyer at DOJ; there is no 2019 edition of my Computer Crime Law casebook, and it certainly wouldn't be the 2nd edition, as we're now on the… [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 12:34 pm
So we’re seeing more defense-side briefs targeting Scalia’s vote. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:43 am
Like Kerr, he’s unfailingly fair. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:10 pm
(Orin Kerr) During the oral argument a few weeks ago in United States v. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:01 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week, the Eleventh Circuit decided an important case, United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
(Orin Kerr) On November 8th, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm
(Orin Kerr) Last week, Judge Koh handed down a significant decision about the legality of e-mail scanning in the case of In Re: Google, Inc Gmail Litigation. [read post]
