Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,239
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Aug 2015, 5:18 am
Jay Michaelson at the Daily Beast questions why we’re all so focused on the wrongs committed by police while ignoring prosecutors gone wild. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 12:36 pm
Yes, prosecutors are professionals — but they’re also politicians, which means that their discretion may be employed politically. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 10:42 am
Further ruminations about the impact of this case from Professor Orin Kerr are available here. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:45 pm
Nevin of Proskauer Rose LLP, Noah Waisberg of Kira Systems and Ian Kerr of the University of Ottawa. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
” In re Application of U.S. for Historical Cell Site Data, 747 F. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 9:44 am
Whether you’re an employee or employer, our knowledgeable attorneys have the experience and skills to help you. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
So if you’re a professor who wants to copy the work for class, go ahead. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 2:05 am
Hydraulic fracturing and its consequences are an important matter of public concern, and lies at the heart of the Court’s unanimous ruling in the case of In Re Steven Lipsky. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 1:22 pm
They’re searching the card to find out. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:50 am
Orin Kerr does a very scholarly job of deconstructing this exchange: First, the cigarette question is pretty easy. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 8:57 am
You’re innocent, as it was a case of mistaken identity. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
If you’re abroad, Microsoft might decide to place your e-mail on a server abroad to make it quicker for you to access your e-mail. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:41 pm
Kerr, Searches and Seizures in a Digital World, 119 Harv L Rev 531, 551 [2005]). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:00 am
The appeal was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr, and Lord Clarke on 22 June 2015 and can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 4:10 pm
Last week’s decision In the matter of an application by JR38 for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2015] UKSC 42,has been the subject of a number case comments: Case Law: Re Application by JR 38 for Judicial Review, Supreme Court sharply divided on whether Article 8 engaged for child suspected of committing crime in public – Alex Bailin QC JR 38 in the UK Supreme Court: the scope of Article 8 ECHR or why Lord Kerr is right – Sophie… [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 5:10 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr takes a shot at answering a question raised by lawprof Michael Dorf. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
Lord Kerr (for the minority) noted that REP was the “touchstone” of private life (applying Campbell v MGN [2004] 2 AC 457). [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
If you’re a Justice who favors the death penalty, it’s a grim but necessary part of the job. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 2:23 am
But if art 8 were engaged the publication would be justified for the reasons given by Lord Kerr. [read post]
