Search for: "In Re Related Asbestos Cases"
Results 421 - 440
of 456
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2009, 8:06 am
They tell you whom to call "When diamonds aren't forever," "When you're only allowed one phone call," or if you or a loved one has had the misfortune of ingesting lead paint, being exposed to asbestos, or suffering an injury in, on, or remotely related to a New York City bus, train, or hospital. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
The Delaware Supreme Court refused to permit an asbestos-related medical monitoring claim in Mergenthaler v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:59 am
" The irresistible part is that this feud involves none other than the In re Johns Manville Corp. constellation of cases, including 06-2320 (2nd Cir., Jan. 17, 2007), in which Mr. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:04 am
Full House for Supreme Court Arguments on Asbestos
Legal Times
The arguments before the Supreme Court Monday in consolidated cases related to a long-running asbestos litigation packed the Court's lawyers' section with insurance and bankruptcy law practitioners, among others. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 6:48 am
HIPAA: Defendants Get Access To Asbestos Claimants' Medical Records, In re Asbestos Prods. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 6:23 am
They think they're helping but they're not. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 4:11 pm
Hissey Kientz LLP launched another new microsite, Mesothelioma Lawyers Help, which focuses on asbestos-related illnesses such as mesothelioma and lung cancer. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:08 pm
Interesting new decision out of the Asbestos MDL the other day, In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 2:41 am
See In re Paoli R.R. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:32 am
Grace & Co. in asbestos-related lawsuits (In re W.R. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:00 pm
The Court held this way in finding that the judge overseeing the state silica multidistrict litigation erred in remanding a sailor's case to its originating court (In re: Global Santa Fe Corp., No. 07-0040, Texas Sup.; 2008 Tex. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
That testimony killed the plaintiff's standard product liability case, because under California (and almost all other states') law, a plaintiff cannot establish causation in an inadequate warning case where the prescribing physician did not rely upon the allegedly defective warning. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
In his experience, however, state court judges tend to move their cases essentially in lockstep with a related MDL.4. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 2:34 am
In re: Johns-Manville Corp., 517 F.3d 52 (2d Cir. 2008). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:07 am
Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider reinstating a $500 million settlement of asbestos-related lawsuits against the Travelers Companies Inc. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
The seminal case, Greenman v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
One of my favorite cases, Huber v. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 7:21 am
" E.g., In re Republic of China Civilian Ammunition Prods. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 3:02 pm
In a recent decision of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, In re Federal Mogul Global, Inc., No. 01-10578 (JKF) (Bankr. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:02 pm
Corp., 778 F.2d 1374, 1379 (9th Cir. 1985); see also In re Comm. of Asbestos Related Litigants, 749 F.2d 3, 5 (2d Cir. 1984) (declining to issue mandamus to review denial of motion to dismiss; suggesting in dicta that such denial was insufficiently final for direct appeal). [read post]
