Search for: "In Re SJ"
Results 421 - 440
of 487
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2016, 5:48 am
We’re happy to discuss with you your concerns. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 4:08 am
But what about THE LAW, which we’re told, no one is above. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
What if anything does this say about sufficiency of evidence/ability to survive sj? [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 9:08 pm
This was the first time the new concept called scientific jury selection (SJS) was applied. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 5:36 am
If you need gertruding, then you aren’t ready for SJ. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:41 am
The message is that there already exists a wealth of knowledge and experience in the blawgosphere, even though you're not aware of it. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 3:11 am
But the Avvo guys like me enough to list SJ as one of their favorite blawgs, so I can't be all bad. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:39 am
Be really careful if you have an FDA practice where you’re dealing in days, not months; people get confused sometimes and calculate based on the wrong unit. 90 days is not the same thing as 3 months. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:33 am
But on the issue of appealing a venue decision citing In re VW II, there are a couple of considerations (I represented the plaintiffs in that case on appeal, so keep that in mind reading the following - readers know who I am and what I do for a living, and I welcome your consideration of that when decide whether what I write is fair. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
So we’re here today to roast our guest of honor, Chris Seaton! [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Court rejects sj motion: factual issues on abandonment, ownership, validity, confusion. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:04 pm
If you guess wrong—put up an orphan work and you’re not a library, your downside risk is too big.Copyright’s purpose is not to chill innovation/speech; also they don’t work as deterrents. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
But what is the problem we’re trying to solve here—what harm will happen if we don’t protect these costumes with ©? [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
” In re Rosuvastatin Calcium Patent Litig., 703 F.3d 511, 519 (Fed. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 11:19 am
Can disagree about Fed Cir’s legal analysis, but if we’re just zeroing in on de novo review, thinks their ability to do so did exist. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 4:36 am
Lisa F. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
Such seven figure verdicts are the kind of things that we worry about in cases where the plaintiff had SJS-TENS, other permanent, life-threatening injury, brain damage, quadriplegia, lingering death – things like that. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 10:07 am
In the past 3 years I have tried a pedagogical experiment in first year civil procedue that I thought I'd share, and on which I'd love feedback. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
We're out on the frontiers of verisimilitude here, and folks, this is as close as you're ever going to see to a guest blogger on this site: Motion for continuance. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 6:23 am
In the future, if you're not going to do either of those things, please do not tell my already deluded client that he "should be able to get" a misdemeanor disposition from a felony. [read post]
