Search for: "In re: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION"
Results 421 - 440
of 758
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
Frank Knight, who published his apology on Facebook, is also paying £20,000 damages to the Oystons. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
District Court, which means that the litigation process was governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 1:55 pm
However, no matter what your privacy settings, you should refrain from posting anything relating to your personal injury case. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:29 pm
However, the rule could still lead to overreach, and will certainly lead to expensive litigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:28 pm
If your privacy settings are not properly set, you may be unwillingly exposing your entire life to everyone on the web, including lawyers and claims adjusters that are bent on trying to discredit you in litigation. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 11:22 am
. ***** Lawyers, social media evidence and discovery obligations If you’re a litigator, you know as well as I do how important social media evidence has become in recent years. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 4:22 pm
Facebook Ireland Ltd [2012] NIQB 96), (2) by virtue of the previous litigation combined with the letters sent to Facebook and to its solicitors, and (3) by virtue of those letters combined with some elementary investigation of the offending profile/page. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:30 am
RT @AdamMossoff: More bogus, junk science in #patent policy w/ claims re: all patent #licensing based on 188 people answering survey https:… -> Ontario Court of Appeal clamps down on surveillance evidence http://t.co/mhHLrQZCst -> Judge tosses 'Frozen' lawsuit filed by N.J. author who accused Disney of ripoff http://t.co/YExeC32o6I -> UK parliament calls for Internet to be classified as a public utility http://t.co/JsqQZa31rf -> Obama hedges position on… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:15 am
— via Employer Advocate Legal Ethics and Social Media: What Pre-Litigation Advice May an Attorney Provide to His or Her Client? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 8:08 am
” A corrections officer only needs to enter a few pieces of information about the inmate—the inmate’s name, profile link, and the crime for which they’re being imprisoned, but not the purported violation of Facebook’s Terms of Service—to get the inmate’s profile taken down. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 6:49 am
Second, you think about giving choices re privacy. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:23 pm
So what do we know about major tech companies, like Google, Facebook, Yahoo, and Microsoft? [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 5:37 am
Case citation: In re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy Litigation, 2015 WL 248334, MDL No. 2443 (SRC) (D.N.J. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 12:03 am
Issues of privacy also dominated discussions of the “snooper’s charter”, a communications data bill which Cameron has promised to revive if re-elected in the wake of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
We’re supposed to assume complete good faith on the government’s part and complete bad faith on the part of employers? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 7:32 am
Jan. 9, 2015) Related posts: Texas Court of Appeals Rejects Privacy Claims Based on Facebook Firing – Roberts v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 6:59 am
’”’ In re Englebrecht, supra. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Order for Financial Records and Facebook Conversations Modified Due to Privacy Rights: In Stallings v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 11:26 am
We did not need another reason to not trust Facebook’s privacy practices, but the argument Facebook raises here, as driven by the necessities of litigation as it likely is, may be one to add to the list. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 4:28 pm
There’s already a great list of contributors and the opportunity for others (perhaps you) to join up.Runner-up – Security, privacy and related matters are at the center of attention these days and no one covers these issues as well and in as plain language as Sharon Nelson in her Ride the Lightning blog. [read post]
