Search for: "In re Buchanan"
Results 421 - 440
of 757
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
Even though Reagan easily coasted to re-election in 1984, the core of the Republican Party that I knew had always been populated by middle-class moderate conservatives who abhorred extremism. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
Adams, Jackson, Van Buren, Polk, Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan, Lincoln, Hayes, Arthur, Cleveland, Harrison, McKinley, Taft, Wilson, Coolidge, F. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:27 am
Legally speaking, the Buchanan-Dorf analysis strikes me as plausible enough. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 11:22 am
So my sense is that this document has effectively been re-referred to the committee that produced it, and that we will probably hear from them again down the road sometime. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The election of 2012 saw the American people soundly reject the Republican Party’s candidates—re-electing Barack Obama and Joe Biden, increasing the number of Democratic seats in the Senate, and casting a majority of their votes for Democratic candidates for the House of Representatives (votes that were nullified, unfortunately and unethically, by Republican gerrymandering of House districts). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:56 am
Here goes:UDC imports the “surplus” idea wholesale from James Buchanan and (in a slightly different version) Mancur Olson. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
” Upon re-reading my column, I certainly see no reason to pull it. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
The White House Runs Away From Its Own Election Victory: The Difference Between Obama the Candidate and Obama the Re-Elected President It is no exaggeration to say that the President won re-election last year by rallying people to the defense of the social safety net, especially the key progressive accomplishments represented by Social Security and Medicare. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 10:09 am
What is this nonsense that ‘they’re in the shadows’? [read post]
14 Apr 2013, 6:32 am
Plaintiffs will call the remainder of their witnesses, and then the defendants and counterclaimants will call theirs -- chiefly Bishops Buchanan and Franklin of ECUSA, and Dr. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 9:01 am
"His aides, including future Republican presidential candidate Patrick Buchanan, wanted to lure Northern Catholic voters, who had traditionally voted Democratic, over to the Republican Party." [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:30 pm
I’m glad you’re my baby. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Buchanan and Dorf explain why this is not correct. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm
The post-election negotiations over the misnamed “fiscal cliff” (which I discussed in my most recent Verdict column) continue to keep the country on a rollercoaster ride. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 7:35 am
Buchanan Three days ago, my Dorf on Law post focused on an odd controversy regarding how people say they will respond to the potential tax increases on the wealthy that might soon become reality in this country. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:02 pm
Buchanan Three days ago, my Dorf on Law post focused on an odd controversy regarding how people say they will respond to the potential tax increases on the wealthy that might soon become reality in this country. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 5:01 am
Buchanan There is an emerging category of news article that has become ubiquitous in the post-election period. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:51 pm
Again, however, I have tenure, and do not have to run for re-election. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:49 am
Sometimes they're just cowardly and servile. [read post]