Search for: "In re Cal. E."
Results 421 - 440
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
From Platforms to Workflows: Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey – Fall 2019 Results
5 Sep 2019, 2:42 pm
Initiated in the fall of 2018 and refreshed semi-annually, this iteration of the survey was graciously distributed and reviewed by the leadership team* at the Association of Certified E-Discovery Specialists (ACEDS) and had the highest responder rate of any predictive coding survey to date with 100 data and legal discovery professionals sharing their understanding and experience as part of the four question survey. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am
Cal. 2002) (`[t]he mere fact that outside counsel was copied with the e-mail will not shield communications not made for the purpose of securing legal advice'). [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 2:00 am
Just fire off an e-mail or a Slack message, and forget about it. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 7:32 am
Je note que l’activité est co-organisée avec la Chaire L. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 5:35 pm
About 389,000 customers in the Bay Area are impacted by PG&E outages. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 5:10 am
As with SPL, the documents labeled as relevant are generally re-reviewed manually. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
As with SPL, the documents labeled as relevant are generally re-reviewed manually. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 12:52 pm
As with SPL, the documents labeled as relevant are generally re-reviewed manually. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 10:51 am
Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246, 1265 (Fla. 2006); In re Chevron Fire Cases, 2005 WL 1077516, at *14-15 (Cal. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 9:58 am
Santa Clara County Bd. of Supervisors (2010) 48 Cal.4th 32, 50.) [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 11:57 am
Sénécal n'est pas avocat mais plutôt professeur en marketing. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 5:30 am
Now, back to the post.California: Under Cal. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 10:48 am
Or simply state there's a §109(e) exclusion. [read post]
24 May 2023, 5:01 am
" (In re Marriage of Hartmann (Cal. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:04 pm
Cal. [read post]
18 May 2007, 9:21 am
After that, I catch up on the three hours' worth of e-mail from my California colleagues that accumulated after I left work the night before. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 5:32 am
”) (citations omitted); In re Cellular Telephones, 2014 WL 7793690, at *9 (Mag. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 5:30 am
In re Anthony J., 72 Cal. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 8:36 am
Cal. 2000). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 4:27 pm
(In re PG&E Corp.), 2020 Bankr. [read post]
