Search for: "In re Hatch"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2014, 10:07 am
They’re probably a mix. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
During prosecution, the examiner imposed a restriction requirement and identified five patentably distinct groups in the application: windshields having “(1) four circular holes and a hatch; (2) four circular or square holes and no hatch; (3) no holes and a hatch; (4) no holes and no hatch; and (5) two oval or rectangular holes and a hatch” (internal citation omitted): The applicant elected group one without traverse (which showed four… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:08 am
“They’re not like drugs. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 4:48 pm
The owner re-built, but did so without complying with newly applicable building bylaws. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 7:41 am
Ct. 2567 (2011), so we’re not going over that again. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
It turns out (at least according to Wikipedia) that the “paper NDA” actually was a shortcut devised by the FDA for generic drugs before there was any Hatch-Waxman Act. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 6:15 pm
But who will provide votes 41+ to prevent the vote: McCain, Graham, Alexander, Portman, Collins, Kirk, even Hatch, who was just re-elected and surely doesn't plan to run for re-election in 2018. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 12:10 pm
Orrin Hatch (R-Utah). [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:01 pm
“Are consumers really getting what they think they’re getting? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
Asserting that the sniff was thus an unconstitutional search, he seeks to have the 31.5 lbs of marihuana found in the rear hatch of his car excluded, leaving the Crown with no case against him. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 8:19 am
How big is the escape hatch that AT&T has provided itself? [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 7:37 am
The FDA statistics, for example, are used in an exaggerated fashion, since after seventeen years − the duration of a patent − most risks of most drugs are pretty well known (that’s one of the reasons Hatch-Waxman was passed in the first place). [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 8:24 pm
The present case is a district court challenge to an issued patent brought under the Hatch-Waxman Act, not a challenge to a PTO rejection brought under § 145, and Hyatt is therefore irrelevant. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 2:43 pm
We’re open to anyone with something serious to say. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 9:59 pm
Actavis), the Federal Trade Commission has filed an amicus curiae brief with the District Court of New Jersey in In re Effexot XR Antitrust Litigation. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 8:05 am
” Facts Shortly after arrival at the load port, the holds and hatch covers failed an inspection by the shippers’ surveyor. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 5:51 am
In In re Isotretinoin Litigation, No. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 8:46 am
He said about the budget that “[w]e’re making a statement to the IRS that enough’s enough. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 7:17 am
Orrin Hatch (R-UT) and his colleagues that I mentioned earlier? [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:50 pm
The Court’s rejection of the “stop-selling” dodge is not based on anything in the Hatch-Waxman amendments. [read post]
