Search for: "In re S.E." Results 421 - 440 of 620
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2011, 9:52 am by Susan Brenner
’ In re Anonymous, supra (quoting In re Amir X.S., 371 S.C. 380, 639 S.E.2d 144 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2006)). [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:10 pm
App. at 156-57, 662 S.E.2d at 94-95, where the challenged venire members were confused by misleading questions during voir dire and therefore did not require rehabilitation. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by Ellen
You’re probably more familiar with the terms used to describe their more frequently used forms, microfilm and microfiche. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm by Orin Kerr
Narick, W.Va. , 292 S.E. 2d 54 (1982); Von Holden v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by SOIssues
State, 286 Ga. 392, 398 (5) (687 S.E.2d 799) (2010). [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 12:48 pm by Nexsen Pruet
. ___, ___ S.E.2d ___ (2011) (2011 WL 93716, filed January 7, 2011)On January 11, 2011, I posted an entry to this blog addressing the South Carolina Supreme Court’s decision in the above-referenced case. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 9:20 am
Ferrari, 668 S.E.2d 236 (2008), and the Pennsylvania Superior Court’s opinion in Wright v. [read post]