Search for: "In re State Bar of Tex. "
Results 421 - 440
of 524
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Allegation: Midland County, Tex. woman who maintains her innocence declines multiple plea deals, is falsely convicted of cocaine possession. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
And in additional en banc news, the Ninth Circuit is going to consider whether the California State Bar is an arm of the state and thus protected by sovereign immunity from claims for damages by an immunocompromised law student forced t [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Eighth Circuit: We agree with the district court that most of the Show-Me State's claims are jurisdictionally barred by the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
In 2021, the Fort Bend, Tex. sheriff excluded independent journalist Justin Pulliam from a press conference, claiming Pulliam was not "media. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:17 am
Tex. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:57 am
But, more than two decades ago a federal court in Pennsylvania, applying Delaware law,[6] and a California appellate court[7] stated the BJR is not applicable to officers. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:58 pm
Donahue (Tex. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Carmen Muro, No. 09-0340 (DDB, and In re State, No. 10-0235 (DDB). [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 3:32 pm
It stated, "Most, but not all, types of debts are discharged if the debt existed on the date the bankruptcy case was filed. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm
State sovereign immunity bars that claim. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:30 pm
Habeas is a high bar that you do not meet. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 9:34 am
Res. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 4:04 pm
LEXIS 6806 (5th Cir 3/31/2011) (unpublished) “Tex. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:23 pm
Tex. 1985) 53 B.R. 166, 172; Burroughs v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm
But, if there is even a possibility that a state court would find that the complaint states a cause of action against any one of the resident defendants, the federal court must find that joinder was proper and remand the case to state court.Slater, 2011 WL 1087240, at *2 (quoting In re Briscoe, 448 F.3d 201, 217 (3d Cir. 2006)) (emphasis original).So what did Slater cite for the proposition that a publisher can be sued for the content of what it publishes? [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
Note, however, that this figure does not include class action suits filed in state court or state court derivative suits, including those in the Delaware Court of Chancery. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 2:38 pm
Tex. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
"[10] It bars the government from discriminating against religious groups more broadly.[11] It should generally bar the government from favoring religious dissenters over the more religiously orthodox, or treating religious communities differently based on their more judgmental belief systems or based on their tendencies to use shame as a sanction. [read post]
