Search for: "Irons v. Irons" Results 421 - 440 of 4,005
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2013, 4:29 am
People v Kennedy, 164 NY 449 (1900): Court found that a weapon was a bludgeon where it was an iron rod was inserted inside a metal pipe. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 12:44 pm
The Opinion of Advocate General Wahl was published today in Case C‑125/14 Iron & Smith Kft v Unilever NV, a request for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) from the Hungarian Fővárosi Törvényszék -- that's the Budapest Municipal Court, if you didn't know ["I knew that", said Merpel ...]. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 11:44 am by Robert Odell
Freeze has stated on their blog: “Ironically, Bingham McCutchen knew their arbitration agreement, as originally drafted, was invalid in light of a 2009 Massachusetts Supreme Court opinion: Warfield v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:20 pm by Jennifer Hendricks
Jessie Hill has posted on SSRN a short and fascinating analysis of the graphic language used in Gonzales v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:36 am by Jag
 If that were the case we would not have had decisions such as S & Marper v UK – which declared unlawful the indefinite retention of DNA samples by police of individuals who had not been convicted of any offences. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 1:46 pm by WIMS
Following an eight-month criminal trial, a jury convicted Atlantic States Cast Iron Pipe Company and four of its managers of various crimes. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 8:26 pm by Donna Eng
Some people who have been reading this blog know that I have been waiting for the decision in Evans v. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 12:12 pm
To some extent that was ironic, because quite a few of our drug (not as much device, but some) company clients were, in fact, headquartered there.Why do we say that? [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 12:11 am by INFORRM
It is ironic – and perhaps a little shocking – that an early high-profile beneficiary of the abolition of the right for juries to try libel cases in England and Wales should be a Member of Parliament – one who will doubtless have supported the Defamation Act 2013 that removed the long-standing right. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:02 pm by Ryan McKeen
I looked at cases involving the Hartford Whalers, various cases about people hitting each other with hockey sticks, and Jaworski v. [read post]