Search for: "J SQUARED, INC." Results 421 - 440 of 500
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2009, 2:01 pm
Burnyeat J. held that such descriptions - now of individual documents - remained sufficient under the new rule. [26] In  Bajic v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
In sum, Rynearson engages in core political expression of a sort squarely within the heartland of what the First Amendment protects, and yet legitimately fears prosecution under the statute based upon the provocative and critical nature of what he writes and publishes online. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Arnold J’s view was that, like “computer software” and “telecommunications services”, it is arguable that FIL’s trade marks are invalid so far as they are registered for “financial services” on the basis that this term lacks clarity and precision. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 2014 WL 1335511 (Pa. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 5:58 am by Tom Joscelyn
“I call them the ‘J-6 hostages,’ not prisoners,” Trump said. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:05 am by Greg Herman-Giddens
Brown, 897 F.2d 275, 283 (7th Cir.1990) (Easterbrook, J., dissenting) (emphasis added)). [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 7:29 am by Joy Waltemath
Southwest General, Inc. dba Southwest Ambulance, March 21, 2017, Roberts, J., C.J.). [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 7:39 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Decision of the New Brunswick Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal reviewed the seminal decisions of Cardozo J. in Jacob & Youngs Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 5:50 pm by Jason Krebs
MAIN BOX 127 GAINESVILLE MO-Missouri  94 J & L MARKET PO BOX 217 207 SOUTH MAINGERALD MO-Missouri  95 Price Chopper 6475 North Prospect Gladstone MO-Missouri  96 Charlie's Quik Chek 302 Jackson Street Glasgow MO-Missouri  97 BALL & PRIER P.O. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
[Here's a draft of my article, on the constitutionality of anti-BDS laws and other related matters, forthcoming in a symposium at The University of the Pacific Law Review.] [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm by MOTP
The Texas high court for civil matters concludes that the Texas law at issue (Section 74.451 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code), does not squarely fall within the scope of a state law enacted to regulate the business of insurance. [read post]