Search for: "J. D. C." Results 421 - 440 of 8,354
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
There is reason to believe the SEC’s new universal proxy Rule 14a-19 will result in more stockholder nominees being elected to the boards of public companies. [read post]
6 May 2023, 2:49 pm by Steve Bainbridge
Article IV Section C of AMC’s certificate of incorporation provides that: “The Board of Directors is hereby expressly authorized, by resolution or resolutions, to establish, out of the unissued shares of Preferred Stock, one or more series of Preferred Stock and to determine, with respect to each such series, the number of shares constituting such series and the designation of such series, the voting powers (if any) of the shares of such series, and the preferences and… [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Reed; (for a similar case from the California courts, though not involving the Trumps, see here): In this lawsuit, Donald J. [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:20 am by Kurt R. Karst
The new certification criterion is further laid out and explained in a special approval status rule for certain subsequent applicants at proposed FDC Act § 505(j)(5)(D)(v): (v) SPECIAL APPROVAL STATUS RULE FOR CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT APPLICANTS. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Fisch (University of Pennsylvania), and Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley) , on Monday, April 24, 2023 Tags: Charter & bylaws, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dual-class stock, IPOs, Shareholders A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court Posted by Adam C. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Fisch (University of Pennsylvania), and Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley) , on Monday, April 24, 2023 Tags: Charter & bylaws, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dual-class stock, IPOs, Shareholders A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court Posted by Adam C. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 5:30 am
April 19, 2023) (Op. by Mundy, J.), the court ruled that the removal of a vehicle from a multiple motor vehicle insurance policy, in which stacked coverage had been previously waived through a waiver form executed by the insured, did not require the insurance carrier to secure a renewed expressed waiver of stacked coverage under §1738(c).At the lower level, the Pennsylvania Superior Court had described the issue in this case as one of first impression. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Intitulé : Martineau Beaupré c. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
 Pix Credit hereThe great project of convergence has been ingloriously drifting toward the trash bin of history de facto even as its once progressive now reactionary claque continues to hold high its de jure banner. [read post]