Search for: "J. J. and W. J. v. J. B. and J. B." Results 421 - 440 of 1,744
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2009, 2:19 pm by Rosalind English
What amounts to “positive action” will no doubt depend upon the circumstances of a particular case and, in some circumstances, the state may be required to take positive steps to prevent ill-treatment at the hands of others (see, e.g., R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] UKHL 38 at [24] per Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood, E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2008] UKHL 66 at [44] per Lord Carswell, and R (B)… [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 11:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Gratz: counternotices v. notices. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 7:47 am by Andrew Weber
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z A Afghanistan Algeria American Samoa Argentina Australia Austria B Bangladesh Bolivia Botswana Brazil C… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:19 pm
This question related to whether the combination product is protected by the amended patent and stems from the idea advanced by Actavis and by Arnold J in Actavis v Sanofi that the combination product may need to embody a separate inventive advance. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 12:03 am by Randall Reese
(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)Motion to Reject Certain Executory Contract (Arbtitron, Inc.) [read post]