Search for: "J. Johnson v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 1,459
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 8:53 am by Paralegal Mentor
Hayhurst, Ohio State Medical AssociationLancaster:Elizabeth J. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
 Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:No person [1] shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, [2] who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to… [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
The Court’s reasoning Silber J considered the case of  R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport [2008] UKHL 15 and concluded that even though that case is awaiting a ruling from the Grand Chamber in Strasbourg, he was bound by the House of Lords’ ruling that the prohibitions on political advertising contained in sections 319 and 321 of the 2003 Act were justified as being necessary in a democratic society… [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 3:09 am
Kristie Urban, No. 98,856 (Johnson)State appeal (petition for review)Janine CoxSufficiency of evidence for agg escape from custody chargeState v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 7 February 2019 there was a one day meaning trial in the case of Poroshenko v BBC before Nicklin J. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 22 June 2022, there was an application in Koutrouchi v Currie Appeal before Johnson J. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am by Giles Peaker
This arose from Johnson v Solihull in the Court of Appeal (Our report here). ii) The issue of whether and how far third party support should be considered when assessing vulnerability. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm by NARF
Beyond Brackeen : Active efforts toward antiracist child welfare policy. / Martin, Andrea Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 6:00 am by Colby Pastre
As Justice Johnson described in 1824, these actions were “destructive to the harmony of the states, and fatal to their commercial interests abroad. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Google also submitted that the Judge was bound by a decision of Kenneth Parker J in R( British Telecommunications) v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Johnson J reached the same decision as Heather Williams J ([2023] EWHC 232 (KB) [pdf]). [read post]