Search for: "JK "
Results 421 - 440
of 445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 6:41 pm
The famous author testified in a Manhattan courtroom in her case against RDR Books, publisher of a "Harry Potter Lexicon" that her lawyers say is at best a derivative knock-off of her work; the WSJ law blog's Dan Slater has coverage here, here, and here. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 3:24 pm
Props to Rowling for discussing this here. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 5:01 pm
Don D. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:24 pm
"The Leaky Cauldron informs us that a trial date has now been set.The Guardian writes on March 11, 2008:"On one side: global-celebrity author JK Rowling. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:39 am
JK at Fluent Simplicity picked up on my post. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
Panel 3: Beyond Fair Use Moderator: Clarisa Long Jessica Litman: (See her article Lawful Personal Use.) [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 4:41 am
There's an excellent article in the business section of the NYT today by Joe Nocera about J. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 1:52 am
In a piece for Slate, Columbia Law Professor Tim Wu argues that JK Rowling should lose her copyright lawsuit against the Harry Potter Lexicon website:As I wrote in October, over the last few years, the relationship between fan-written Web sites and the copyright owners of the content they draw on, if legally murky, has at least been peaceful. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:17 am
With almost 100,000 votes already tallied, JK Rowling tops the user-generated list. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 9:00 pm
Interesting news this week (well, the end of last week) was the lawsuit by JK Rowlings and Warner Bros over the print version of an online Lexicon created by fans. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 7:37 am
. -- Public Knowledge• JK Rowling and Warner are suing a creator of a Harry Potter reference guide for unauthorized derivative work; a Harry situation indeed. -- The Trademark Blog• Prince is threatening fan sites to remove all content related to his royal self; fans have responded by creating Prince Fans United, or Prince F.U., for short. [read post]
3 Nov 2007, 9:06 pm
Text of complaint in Warner Bros Ent and JK Rowling v RDR Books, SDNY Oct 31 2007. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 6:05 pm
The first rule of Harry Potter, you do not write about Harry Potter! [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 2:31 pm
Why hire a gigantic company like JK Harris and Company when you can get the personalized attention only a small law firm can provide. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 4:52 am
TimesJK Rowling judge made mistakes, says privacy law expertThe judge in the JK Rowling privacy case should have taken account of the fact that celebrities may be more vulnerable to media pressure than others and so entitled to stronger privacy protection a leading legal expert has said. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 8:04 am
“The judge in the JK Rowling privacy case should have taken account of the fact that celebrities may be more vulnerable to media pressure than others and so entitled to stronger privacy protection a leading legal expert has said. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 7:01 pm
Harry, his friends, and JK Rowling have temporarily ruined my life and I hold them soley accountable for all the problems that I have ever faced. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 3:47 pm
JK Rowling has lambasted US newspapers that have published plot details from the final Harry Potter book. [read post]
2 Jun 2007, 9:58 am
JK: Yes, absolutely. [read post]
