Search for: "JOHN DOE AND PREDECESSORS"
Results 421 - 440
of 764
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2016, 2:02 pm
But the ceasefire does not include Aleppo, which has seen the resumption of full on war in recent weeks. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Kind of a frightening thought.Follow @JohnWDean John W. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:50 pm
The triumph of theory over practice needs does it not our admiration. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm
Here is John’s article. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Russo, which predated the enactment of section 3(e), but interpreted its uncodified predecessor, in which the SJC ruled that judges could depart from mandatory minimums but only after sentencing guidelines were enacted.Laltaprasad, represented by Matt Segal and others at the ACLU,arguedthat section 3(e) is plain on its face and it allows judges to depart from the mandatory minimum sentences, that Russo does not control because it interpreted an earlier, uncodified version… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Russo, which predated the enactment of section 3(e), but interpreted its uncodified predecessor, in which the SJC ruled that judges could depart from mandatory minimums but only after sentencing guidelines were enacted.Laltaprasad, represented by Matt Segal and others at the ACLU, argued that section 3(e) is plain on its face and it allows judges to depart from the mandatory minimum sentences, that Russo does not control because it interpreted an earlier, uncodified version of the… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 11:38 am
Russo, which predated the enactment of section 3(e), but interpreted its uncodified predecessor, in which the SJC ruled that judges could depart from mandatory minimums but only after sentencing guidelines were enacted.Laltaprasad, represented by Matt Segal and others at the ACLU, argued that section 3(e) is plain on its face and it allows judges to depart from the mandatory minimum sentences, that Russo does not control because it interpreted an earlier, uncodified version of the… [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 3:44 am
John Plunkett, a forensic pathologist, who has been one of the leading defense experts against the mythology of SBS. [read post]
9 Apr 2016, 6:26 am
Eric Schmidt Refusing to Answer Questions from Senator John Cornyn on the Advice of Counsel Timeline of Google’s Resistance to General Hood’s Investigation Where were we then, back in October 2014? [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:31 am
What does Paul Ryan actually think about tax policy? [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:10 am
It does not relieve our leaders of their powers and does not cease to have effect at certain times, even during presidential elections. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
Here is John’s guest post. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
Schrems himself has made a statement that he does not think this is enough, particularly pointing out that the above does not even begin to address misuse of personal data by private entities on behalf of the US intelligence services. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:00 am
My predecessor, President Bush, to his credit, said he wanted to close it. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 5:00 pm
John Kasich. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
Sayeed observed that Pakistan’s civil servants ‘often play an even more powerful role than that of their imperial predecessors’. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 7:29 am
With the retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, no youngest child serves on the Court. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 7:45 am
” In an interview with Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, Savage gives a loose sketch of how the characteristic Obama administration approach to process has distinguished this administration from its predecessor’s excesses: So… the Bush administration goes to a John Yoo or a David Addington and he writes a two-page memo that says, ‘The president is commander-in-chief. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 11:39 am
The Roberts Court does not share the post-bellum Democratic commitment to white supremacy. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 6:30 am
We could devote an entire roundup to reports of Chief Justice John G. [read post]
