Search for: "John Doe Defendants 1 - 5"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2011, 12:35 pm
” §3626(a)(1)(A). [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:50 am
This question comes before us on the state's appeal from the dismissal of three consolidated informations charging the defendant, John Panek, with violating § 53a–189a (a)(1) in that manner against three different women. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am
On Oct. 5, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a habeas petition on behalf of John Doe, the detained combatant, alleging that the detention was in violation of the Non-Detention Act (NDA). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 11:19 am
Penman: 11 Former Public Defender David McKenna: 2 San Bernardino City Clerk: Gigi Hanna: 3 Peggi Hazlett: 7 Esther Jimenez: 1 Amelia Sanchez-Lopez: 6 (including “who is on the campaign signs with Jim Penman”) William Valle: 1 I think the most surprising stat is the lack of Chas Kelley searches. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
During my recent visit to Columbia Law School, Professor John Coffee shared with me a draft of a short article that later appeared in the New York Law Journal.[1] Coffee’s article assessed the prospects in the U.S. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Here then is the brief: [* * *] Summary of Argument An anti-libel injunction, enforceable through the threat of prosecution for criminal contempt, is like a miniature criminal libel law—just for a particular defendant, and just for particular statements about a particular plaintiff.[1] That is its virtue. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 8:48 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relisted and held cases. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 4:30 am
What Does This Mean for Enron and its Creditors? [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:03 pm
Bell (relisted after the 4/22, 4/29, 5/12, and possibly 1/20 Conferences) Docket: 10-8629 Issue(s): (1) Whether the prosecution violated Brady v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:28 am
Does 1–426, supra. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:22 am
Top 5 Non-Election Related Items #5: Congress Passes Defend Trade Secrets Act. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:33 pm
John Fund, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:37 am
Moreover, the materials submitted by the defendants in support of their motion did not constitute "documentary evidence" within the meaning of CPLR 3211(a)(1) (see Fontanetta v John Doe 1,AD3d, 2010 NY Slip Op 02743 [2d Dept 2010]) and, in any event, did not "utterly refute[] plaintiff[s'] factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law" (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
1. [read post]
25 May 2009, 7:15 am
What activity does each of the executioner(s) perform? [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:25 pm
Sussex I State Prison Defendants -Appellees and JOHN DOES 1-100 Defendant ORDER Appellant filed an application for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and a motion to place this case in abeyance and enjoin appellees from executing him on October 17, 2007, pending decision by the United States Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Id. at *5, *6-*7. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:10 pm
The meaning of "perfect love" in the context of 1 John is very clear -- it is the perfect love of our creator, God. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
But he said he didn't know he was listed as the "sole organizer" of MCGIP, a firm that has sued numerous John Doe defendants for pornographic copyright infringement. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
§ 1125(a)(1)(A) (2006)). [read post]
