Search for: "John Does 1 And 2" Results 421 - 440 of 10,118
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2022, 7:31 pm by Alicia Maule
Policymakers are now also focusing their attention on regulating interrogation methods employed in the interview room and the courthouse. 2. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:02 am by Eugene Volokh
" The identified general exceptions are: (1) where "a would-be Doe who reasonably fears that coming out of the shadows will cause him unusually severe harm (either physical or psychological)"; (2) where "identifying the would-be Doe would harm 'innocent non-parties'"; (3) where "anonymity is necessary to forestall a chilling effect on future litigants who may be similarly situated"; and (4) where the suit is "bound… [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
The Board methodically affirmed a Section 2(e)(1) refusal to register the mark AUTOSTITCH, finding it merely descriptive of software for editing and manipulating images and for photographic editing services. [read post]
17 Nov 2007, 2:07 am
Assembled here.Of course, you know what #1 is. #2 is harder to guess, and it's a matter of opinion, but I approve:1762 The sandwich is created as gambler John Montagu, 4th Earl of Sandwich, calls for his dinner to be put between two slices of bread so he can continue his card game with one hand and eat with the other. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 4:18 am
And the certification mark TEQUILA cleared the opposition hurdle.Section 2(a) - Deceptiveness:Precedential No. 8: TTAB Finds KLEER ADHESIVES Deceptive, But Not KLEER MOULDINGS and KLEER TRIMBOARDSection 2(b) - Flag, Coat of Arms, or Other Insignia:Precedential No. 7: TTAB Affirms Section 2(b) Refusal of Mark Simulating the Prince of Wales EmblemPrecedential No. 3 = TTAB Test: Does this Mark Include a Simulation of the Swiss Flag? [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 4:13 am
" The Board declined to reach the issue of deceptive misdescriptiveness under Section 2(e)(1). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:45 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Our Client’s Situation John Doe and his wife Jane Doe reached out to us after finding themselves at the center of the chaos caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:28 am by SHG
Whether this John Doe did anything blameworthy to begin with is a matter of values. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
But that does not imply that the prosecution will be a slam dunk or that Trump does not have defenses on which prosecutors have not yet fully focused. [read post]
17 Dec 2006, 3:12 pm
In In re Taylor Tate, Inc., Serial No. 78463524 (December 1, 2006) [not citable], the Board found Applicant's spa services to be related to hair and skin care products, and it consequently affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal of the mark shown immediately below [DAY SPA & SHOP disclaimed] in light of the registered mark LOVJOI.Examining Attorney Ingrid C. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 7:59 am
The anonymous plaintiff, John Doe, brought an action under 42 USC § 1983, claiming that Pennsylvania's Registration of Sexual Offender's Act, 42 Pa. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:37 am by VMaryAbraham
  Where does the honesty come into play? [read post]