Search for: "Jones v. Davis"
Results 421 - 440
of 517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 10:10 am
However the CPS guidance quotes "DPP v McKeown, DPP v Jones ([1997] 2Cr App R, 155, HL at page 163) [where] Lord Hoffman defined a computer as "a device for storing, processing and retrieving information". [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
E.g., Elliott v. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 3 March 2017 the Court of Appeal (Lewison, Lloyd-Jones and McCombe LJJ) gave judgment in the important data protection case of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens RTM Company Ltd & Ors [2017] EWCA Civ 121. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
Judge Davis dissented and disagreed with all three holdings. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 9:14 am
Nov. 21, 2021)Jones v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Jones v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
IPSO has published one ruling since our last Round Up: 05869-19 Begum V The Daily Mirror, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 6 Children (2018), Breach- sanction: publication of correction Recent Judgments On 8 April 2020 Warby J handed down judgment in Birmingham City Council v Afsar (No.4) [2020] EWHC 864 (QB). [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(UC Davis)Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)Tschoegl Adrian E. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 1:00 am
In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
IT-Davy, 74 S.W.3d 849, 853 (Tex. 2002). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Gordon College v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:33 am
Mapp v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 4:28 pm
v=j0pl_FXt0eMWilliam F. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Jones, No. 07-2052 Sentence is affirmed where defendant pled guilty to charges stemming from her role in a bank fraud conspiracy. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Jones, No. 07-5994 In a prosecution for firearm possession by a felon, the District Court's order suppressing evidence is reversed, where the District Court, in assessing whether the officers who arrested Defendant had reasonable suspicion, erred by failing to take into account all information observed by the officers until Defendant yielded to unambiguous police authority. . [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
Mast v. [read post]
