Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 421 - 440
of 739
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2013, 10:33 am
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, concerning whether a state amending its constitution to prevent race or sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in the admissions decisions of its public universities violates the Equal Protection Clause, and National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:58 am
Part Four: User Generated Content (Content Treasure Trove v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 7:03 pm
Trooper Cuprill’s observations of Jones’ seat belt violation justified the initial stop of Jones and defendant in the vehicle. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am
The lower court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all claims. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 10:00 pm
Bard, Inc. 2:10-cv-01224 Jones v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:31 am
Ramsey’s later work as a defense attorney took this kind of advocacy even further, as he defended clien [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
Consent Decree (April 4, 2013); Mervin Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 11:53 pm
“The company doesn’t attempt to defend its product, nor is it our role to defend their product. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:33 am
Jones, 9 NY3d 259, 262, 848 NYS2d 600 (2007), citing People v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:06 pm
There are no new PCC adjudications this week, but four new resolved PCC cases: Mr Johnny Dean v NME NME, Clause 3, 25/01/2013; Mr Ian Calland v Golf Monthly, Clause 1, 24/01/2013; Mr Martin Jones v Reading Post, Clause 1, 24/01/2013 and Dame Tessa Jowell v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 24/01/2013. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 6:22 am
Jones (Assault of public safety personnel; engaging police in pursuit; "The defendant, William T. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm
The officer exercised unfettered discretion and seized the defendant, without further justification, to see if he had a committed a crime. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:00 am
Jones, 132 S. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:30 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 5:26 am
Certainly Defendants sold their services to the general public. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
Cir. 2003) (hat tip Bill Shea)- failure to take advantage of effective system to report/stop harassment (in Title VII actions, called the Faragher-Ellerth defense) (see Jones v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 5:38 am
Jones, raise such questions in spades. [read post]
