Search for: "Julie Vis"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,446
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2019, 5:00 am
” Jeffrey Rosen, Brandeis’s Seat, Kagan’s Responsibility, New York Times (July 3, 2010). [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:47 pm
District Court of Colorado, 18CV01725, on July 9, 2018. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:05 pm
First Submission, para. 169): * In a July 1947 meeting, the U.S. delegate observed that in situations such as times of war, “no one would question the need of a Member, or the right of a Member, to take action relating to its security interests and to determine for itself—which I think we cannot deny—what its security interests are. * In the same meeting, the Chairman stated “in defence of the text,” that, when the ITO was in operation, “the atmosphere… [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 8:00 am
The loan was not repaid in July 218, and in August 2018, NHF brought possession proceedings on the loan, the term interest and a contractual interest rate on default of 12% compounding monthly (289.6% pa). [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 2:46 am
More recently, the negative attitude of European courts vis-à-vis punitive damages has been replaced, at least in some States, by a more open approach. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:08 am
SPECIAL THANKS We appreciate the assistance of David Viëtor and Marc Orval of NautaDutilh NV with the following discussion of Dutch law, regulation and practice. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:21 am
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 1:52 pm
The initial 2010 application to register PELOTON for “magazines in the field of bicycles” was denied on grounds of descriptiveness; it was added to the Supplemental Register in July 2011. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 7:37 am
This law became effective on July 1, 2019. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 11:48 pm
vi. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:08 am
[vi] The following is worth reading: Brian Hawkins, The Life of the Law: What Holmes Meant, Whittier Law Review (last revised July 21, 2012), available at the Social Science Research Network. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:39 am
The New York Constitution explicitly states that the Surrogate’s Court has jurisdiction over matters involving decedents only insofar as they are “not within the exclusive jurisdiction of supreme court” (NY Const Art VI, 12 [d]). [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 6:05 am
As the protest in Hong Kong entered its 13th week, a public dialogue that runs parallel to the protest has been unfolding between and among state actors. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 9:56 am
The Proposed Expansion to Cover Victims of Sexual Harassment If enacted, A.B. 171 would expand these provisions in three ways, beginning July 1, 2020. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:28 pm
For example, CMS did not finalize coverage of Next Generation Sequencing tests (diagnostic laboratory tests administered to patients with advanced cancer), until March, 2018.[6] Additionally, Medicare still does not pay for genetic testing in many cases.[7] Even the common genetic tests for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation linked to breast cancer are only covered by Medicare under certain circumstances such as a family history of breast cancer.[8] VI. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:13 am
On July 18, 2017, then-Judge Ariana Fajardo Orshan entered an Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Sanctions and/or Contempt …, finding that Ener "contemptuously, willfully, and deliberately violated the clear and express orders of [the] Court" by, among other reasons, failing to attend court-ordered mediation, refusing to communicate with the Court-appointed Guardian Ad Litem, and failing to comply with the Court's visitation order. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
On July 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada granted leave in 9147-0732 Québec inc. c. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 3:09 pm
Some other recent examples illustrate how varied and almost epidemic cyber-attacks vis-a-vis third party vendors have become, including: AMCA (Billing Vendor). [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 3:07 pm
On July 30, 2019, in Bullock vs. [read post]
3 Aug 2019, 8:52 am
Kaur v Griffith, County Court at Bromley. 25 July 2019 This was a set aside application of a possession order against Ms G. [read post]
