Search for: "K. K. B., In re"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,379
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2010, 3:27 am
,B- San? [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 4:55 am
Die Verwendung wäre als Eigengebrauch durch Lehrpersonen im Unterricht qualifiziert worden (Art. 19 Abs. 1 lit. b URG). [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:01 pm
Therefore, the subject-matter of claim 1 according to the first auxiliary request is entitled to the priority of document D0 (A 87(1)(b)). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:21 pm
RES? [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
” Today’s orders list also dismissed as moot the parallel mandamus petition, IN RE CONOCOPHILLIPS COMPANY F/K/A PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY, DCP MIDSTREAM, LP F/K/A GPM GAS CORPORATION..., No. 12-0199 . [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm
A request for re-establishment was refused.The applicant filed a complaint before epi on March 24, 2009. [read post]
30 May 2013, 5:01 pm
In exceptional circumstances the appellant may of course decide to withdraw the appeal without filing a statement of grounds of appeal and before the time limit for doing so has expired, thus qualifying for the reimbursement of the appeal fee under R 103(1)(b). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 10:58 am
These are (using rough estimates of initial-letter frequencies in English words) the chances a) that seven randomly selected lines of English text begin with f, u, c, k, y, o, and u, in that order, b) that eight randomly selected lines of English text begin with i, f, u, c, k, y, o, and u, in that order, and c) that the first letters of eight randomly selected lines of English text and two blank lines separating those lines into three groups appear in the sequence i,… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:11 pm
Die Ehegatten können die Vorschlagsbeteiligung in gewissen Grenzen ehevertraglich ändern (ZGB 216 I). [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:58 am
., Opposition No. 91160810 [Section 2(d) opposition to registration of the mark OXIUM for "Oxygenated skin care preparations, namely, creams, masks, gels and lotions for the face, hands, feet and body, not including acne preparations," on the ground of likely confusion with various registered marks comprising or containing the term OXY for acne medication, skin care preparations, skin wash, and skin cleanser.]December 11, 2007 - 11 AM: In re K&B… [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 2:00 am
§§ 40B and 6426(k) . [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
As the Druckexemplar did in fact include page 6, and this was the legally binding text, the objections raised by the respondent-opponent under A 100(b) and A 123(3), based solely on the missing page 6, the appellant proprietor’s requests for correction under R 140 or amendment, as well as the ensuing discussion during the OPs before the Board concerning A 123(3)) and the Board’s finding above were from a substantive point of view legally unfounded (not having considered the… [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:15 am
" As the staff noted:Answer: With respect to any resignation, retirement or refusal to stand for re-election reportable under Item 5.02(b), the Form 8-K reporting obligation is triggered by a notice of a decision to resign, retire or refuse to stand for re-election provided by the director, whether or not such notice is written, and regardless of whether the resignation, retirement or refusal to stand for re-election is conditional or… [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
üyesi, böyle bir belirleme yap? [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:42 pm
: B.03.0.CTE.0.00.24.00/245/52525 12/04/2012 Konu : 6291 say? [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
(b) [“The times specified . [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:40 pm
kin hükümlerine göre ceza sorumlulu? [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 3:10 am
lere göre bast? [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
The statement of grounds of appeal was filed by fax on March 9, 2011.On April 21, the applicant requested re-establishment. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
[Opponent 1] has countered this request by pointing out that apportionment of costs was only justified if there had been an abuse of procedure, and that there had not been such an abuse in the present case.[17] The Board does not endorse this argument, simply because of Article 16(1) RPBA:(1) Subject to A 104(1), the Board may on request order a party to pay some or all of another party’s costs which shall, without limiting the Board’s discretion, include those incurred by any (a) … [read post]
